Great idea! I wanted to explore more with Lovable, it’s just tricky to find time for everything I want to do plus chores that need to be done.

@Corey Malone congratulations, great news!! 🎉👏👏

Thank you all for the thoughtful discussion, I really enjoyed seeing how differently this landed for everyone. What stood out to me most was the range of digital twins people explored: from personal advisor and counselor, to career coach, to very professional, task-oriented thinking partners. I also loved the comparison between tools, especially the observation that ChatGPT felt more empathetic and reflective, while Gemini leaned more step-by-step and result-oriented. Marian’s point about Gemini being shaped more from a software-engineering mindset really captured that difference well. For me, that contrast highlights something important: it’s not just which AI you use, but how you design the interaction and how much of the human perspective you consciously bring into it. I was also intrigued by the idea of having multiple digital twins for different contexts (a professional one, a personal one, maybe even a strategic or reflective one) while still keeping ourselves firmly “in the loop” as the human guide and supervisor. Looking forward to continuing this conversation and seeing how your digital twins evolve over time.

After our Digital Twin discussion, I built a small experiment. I created a custom GPT that asks you a few questions and then generates a Digital Twin prompt based on your answers, using the same template we worked with in the workshop. At the end, you’ll have a ready-to-use customized prompt you can copy into ChatGPT or use to create your own Custom GPT for your Digital Twin. If you’re curious, try it here:👉 https://chatgpt.com/g/g-6952b47f1e008191bcbf7a255783f63e-digital-twin-creator Would love to hear if it’s helpful :) @Danny Setiawan @Corey Malone @Marian Banica @Lisa Davies

Merry Christmas! 😁 I challenge @Farooq Khayyat

My biggest takeaway was how powerful deep storytelling is for making personas actually usable. The way the persona was framed felt almost cinematic. I found myself genuinely empathizing and mentally walking through a “day in the life.” The comic especially made it click emotionally, not just intellectually. What also stood out to me were the pressure-test questions. They were incredibly helpful for moving beyond “this feels right” and really analyzing our personas. What assumptions are we making? What are we missing? Where might we be projecting? That combination of emotional immersion and critical analysis was surprisingly effective. It made the persona feel both human and strategically solid. It was a great reminder that good personas are not static artifacts, but something you actively interrogate and refine over time.