Case Study 81: Pressure to Lift MEWP Without Correct Accessories

Incident Overview

A general foreman instructed a slinger to lift a MEWP/scissor lift without the correct lifting accessories or shackles. No lift supervisor had been appointed. When the slinger refused, the foreman accused him of non-cooperation and attempted to source advice from unqualified personnel outside the lifting team.

The slinger continued to refuse.

What Went Wrong

Programme pressure escalated into coercion. The foreman attempted to bypass lifting controls and undermine competent refusal.

Key Lessons Learned

Refusal is a safety control

Outside advice does not replace competence

Blame culture discourages safe decisions

Safety Recommendations

Mechanical plant must only be lifted using manufacturer-approved methods and accessories. Refusal to lift under unsafe conditions must be supported, not challenged.

●LOLER Reg. 8 – Unsafe lifts must not proceed.

●PUWER Reg. 4 – Accessories must be suitable and approved.

●PUWER Reg. 9 – Competence includes refusing unsafe work.

●BS 7121-1 – Plant must be lifted using approved methods only.

Clear Message

Refusal to lift is a safety control.

Wolf Lifting Dynamics – Safe Lifting UK | Case Study 81

0 comments