Case Study 65: What Is a Lifting Team? Role Confusion on Site
Incident Overview
A site treated lifting as “the crane driver’s job.” Tradesmen gave instructions directly to the operator, the slinger tried to manage landings alone, and no one managed exclusion zones. When questioned, people couldn’t clearly explain who was responsible for what.
What Went Wrong
The crane team was not defined as a system. Lifting became fragmented, with missing functions: supervision, coordination, comms discipline and ground control.
Key Lessons Learned
A crane team is a safety system
Undefined roles create gaps
One lift requires one coordinated team
Safety Recommendations
Define the crane team clearly: AP (planning/authorisation), Lift Supervisor (execution control), Slinger/Signaller (attachment and signalling), Operator (safe crane control), plus lift co-ordinator if multiple cranes works in proximity.
●LOLER Reg. 8 – Clear roles are required.
●PUWER Reg. 9 – Team competence matters.
●BS 7121-1 – Crane team roles must be defined.
Key point
Lifting is a team system.
Wolf Lifting Dynamics – Safety HUB | Case Study 65
0
0 comments
Vlad Lupu
2
Case Study 65: What Is a Lifting Team? Role Confusion on Site
powered by
Safe Lifting UK
skool.com/wolf-lifting-dynamics-9548
This community shares real lifting case studies, consultancy insights, and site-proven lessons covering cranes, supervision, planning, and execution.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by