do it here: https://topchess.fandom.com/wiki/Top_Chess_Wiki

From my previous post, I did want people to make action but please don't put hate or attack the channel or Joey or the new editor. Just politely reply some confused viewers that DeepChess is the continuation of original creators' top chess lore if U really are going to reply some viewers comments like I did But I'm not sure what's best for the action rn. We have to discuss about it here. Dsb wants us to find who the editor is. While we wants the truth to be known, wants greater chance for Dsb to get the support or fundings I'm so sorry if I mess things up. Remember no matter what we are going to do, do not go too far Please start our discussion below:

https://www.skool.com/top-chess-gang-7947/i-have-a-plan-inspired-my-koob-kao?p=f497adad I agree with the idea of getting the history out there, but I think the alt-account + 60 comments part could backfire. If we flood the comments with multiple accounts, people can just dismiss everything as spam instead of actually looking at the information. YouTube also has policies against repetitive/high-volume comment spam and artificial engagement. I'd rather have 10 people make 10 genuinely different, well-sourced comments from their actual accounts. One can explain the 2025 split, another can explain DeepChess, another can focus on the lore continuity, another can provide the timeline, etc. That would be harder to dismiss because we're not trying to manufacture the appearance of support. We're just making sure the history isn't being left out. The goal should be “make the information impossible to miss,” not “make the comments impossible to count.”

so well my name is deadass obvious. i'm 11, and of course go to school. do not make me mad