10d (edited) • 🏟️ The Main Stage
Standing in Court Without Surrendering Your Rights (Script)
THE ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION SCRIPT
(living man + ecclesiastical domain + private trust + trademark protection + commercial separation)
Tone: calm, respectful, warm, slightly humorous, non-threatening.
Use this EXACT flow.
⭐ PHASE 1 — Establish Honor, Intention, and Good Faith
You:
Your Honor, before we proceed, may I clarify a few points so I remain in honor and do not unintentionally enter into contracts or misrepresent myself?
Judge:
Go ahead.
You:
Thank you. I appreciate your patience in helping me stay aligned with the court’s process.
(This disarms him immediately.)
⭐ PHASE 2 — Shift the Judge into the Administrative Frame
(Safe, non-controversial, but it opens the door)
You:
Your Honor, courts operate in different lanes of law — civil, criminal, equity, and sometimes admiralty.
For my own clarity and to avoid confusion, which lane is the court proceeding under today?
Judges never get angry at this question.
They think: “Reasonable.”
You’ve now forced him to THINK about jurisdiction.
⭐ PHASE 3 — Identity Without Trigger Words
(You must separate yourself from the PERSON without declaring it)
Judge:
You are the defendant.
You:
Thank you, Your Honor.
Just to be sure I respond correctly — is the term “defendant” being applied to me, the living man standing here,
or to the legal name printed on the docket?
This question is LEGALLY REQUIRED before you can be held liable.
It is NOT a “sovereign” question.
It is a due process clarity question.
⭐ PHASE 4 — Introduce the Trademark/Entity Issue Without Revealing Ownership
(This is delicate — do NOT reveal the trust)
If the judge says: “It’s just your name.”
You:
I understand. My only concern is accuracy.
Many names on public documents today refer to registered entities, LLCs, or trademarked properties.
I simply want to avoid speaking on behalf of any registered property or commercial entity
unless the court is making a clear determination that the name printed here is not one of those.
This is PERFECT:
- You did not claim the LLC
- You did not reveal ownership
- You did not mention the trust
- You did not say “That is a TM”
- You did not deny it either
- You simply asked the judge to confirm his determination
And he cannot make that determination.
He has no authority to declare the legal nature of a name.
You just placed a landmine under the docket without looking aggressive.
⭐ PHASE 5 — Transition to Ecclesiastical Domain
(This must be extremely gentle and legally protected)
You:
Your Honor, I want to make sure I do not unintentionally step outside my protected spiritual rights.
I hold a sincerely held belief, grounded in First Amendment protections,
that my body is the Temple of the Holy Spirit.
This is NOT a legal argument.
This is a sincerely held belief protected by federal law.
No judge can touch it.
No prosecutor can touch it.
This is the SAME protection Muslims use for religious rights.
Sikhs use for their turbans.
Jews use for Sabbath.
Christians use for conscience doctrines.
This is rock solid.
⭐ PHASE 6 — Connect the Ecclesiastical Identity to Legal Standing
(Deep but safe)
You:
Because of this sincerely held belief, I must always operate as the living man.
I need to be careful not to step into the role of an artificial entity, minor, ward, or commercial vessel
unless I knowingly consent.
I hope the court can appreciate my desire to remain in honor while maintaining my spiritual integrity.
This is GOLD.
- No sovereign citizen triggers
- Zero confrontation
- Absolute legal protection
- And you established that the PERSON is a role, not your identity
⭐ PHASE 7 — Force the Judge to Distance Himself from Mischaracterization
(Crucial)
You:
Your Honor, just so there is no misunderstanding —
would you agree that the First Amendment protects my right
to practice my beliefs without being labeled or mischaracterized
as belonging to any political movement or ideology?
This nails the “sovereign citizen” trap.
Once he says “Yes,” he can never use that label.
⭐ PHASE 8 — The Ecclesiastical Contract Question
(The moment everything shifts)
You:
Thank you.
With that said, may I ask one final point of clarity:
Is this court requiring me to abandon my ecclesiastical identity as the Temple of the Holy Spirit
and step into the commercial role of the legal person
in order to proceed?
This is the most powerful line in the entire script.
Why?
Because if he says:
Yes → He violates the First Amendment.
No → You remain the living man.
Avoids → He cannot force jurisdiction.
Either way:
YOU WIN.
⭐ PHASE 9 — How to Close the Loop
(Final alignment)
You:
Thank you, Your Honor. My intent is to proceed respectfully,
but only in the proper capacity.
If the court is addressing me as the living man, I’m ready to continue in honor.
If the court is addressing a legal entity or commercial property,
I would need to know who is authorized to speak for that entity
so I do not commit fraud or misrepresentation.
This final line is INSANE.
Why?
Because:
- You refuse unauthorized representation
- You refuse suretyship
- You refuse commercial liability
- You protect your trademark
- You protect your trust
- You protect your ecclesiastical status
- You remain the living man
- And you remain polite
It leaves the judge with only one safe option:
Treat you as the living man.
1
2 comments
Standing in Court Without Surrendering Your Rights (Script)
powered by
skool.com/title-8-academy-1862
The School You Should’ve Had! Why weren’t we ever taught about credit of finance basics in school? What is money 💰 anyway? Foundational Keys 🔑🧠✨📖
Suggested communities
Powered by