11d • General discussion
More than research: PNI
# PNI: three letters that permanently change the way you think about knowledge
Some abbreviations come and go. Others stay with you — not because they are easy, but because they name something you already sensed but couldn’t quite articulate. PNI is that kind of abbreviation. Three letters. Three words. And if you take them seriously, three fundamentally different ways of thinking about research, about people, and about where knowledge actually lives.
PNI stands for **Participatory Narrative Inquiry**. It was developed and pioneered by **Cynthia Kurtz**, whose groundbreaking work has shaped how researchers, organisations and communities around the world think about stories, participation and sense-making. Her book *Working with Stories* remains one of the most generous and rigorous contributions to the field — freely shared with the world, which in itself says something about her philosophy. Let’s walk through the three letters one by one.
P — Participatory
This is the heart of it. The letter everything else revolves around, and the letter that deserves the most space — not because the other two matter less, but because *participatory* is at once the most overused, most misunderstood and most promising word in the research world.
And I’ll be honest: it is the letter that matters most to me personally.
In most research approaches, knowledge sits with the researcher. The researcher designs the questions, defines the categories, interprets the answers and draws the conclusions. Participants are a source — valuable, certainly — but it is the researcher and their instruments that transform raw data into insight. The people being studied are, in a sense, the material. The researcher is the one who makes sense of it.
Participatory Narrative Inquiry turns that around completely. In PNI, knowledge does not reside with the researcher. It resides with the people involved. They are not sources of data to be extracted and translated — they are carriers of meaning. The task of the researcher is not to mine that meaning, but to create a space in which it can become visible: to the participants themselves, and to the community they are part of.
This might sound like a subtle distinction. It is not. It changes everything. it means participants don’t just answer questions others have designed — they help shape which questions are worth asking in the first place. It means they don’t just provide input for a report they’ll never read — they actively contribute to a process that concerns them and whose outcomes they can understand and use. It means the researcher must be willing to let go: of control, of agenda, of the comfortable assumption of being the smartest person in the room.
That is not easy. Participatory research asks something of you. It asks for humility. It asks for the capacity to listen without immediately interpreting. It asks for genuine belief in the idea that people — including those without academic training, including those who struggle to put their experiences into words — know things you do not know and never will know unless you truly make room to hear them.
This is why the P matters so much to me. In my own work, I have seen time and again what happens when you approach people as sources to be processed rather than as knowers to be heard. You get answers, but not understanding. You get data, but not meaning. The moment you shift your stance — the moment you start from the assumption that the knowledge is already there, present in the people you are working with — something changes. People open up differently. Conversations go deeper. And what emerges surprises you in ways that no questionnaire ever could.
Knowledge is not something the researcher brings to a community and deposits there. It is already present, in the experiences, the stories and the everyday wisdom of the people involved. The researcher’s job is to help bring it to the surface.
N — Narrative
The second word is narrative — story. And here too there is more than first meets the eye. We live in a world that loves data. Numbers, statistics, percentages, dashboards. Data feels objective, reliable, scalable. Stories feel subjective, anecdotal, hard to generalise. And so we flatten the world by reducing everything to what can be measured.
But people do not live in data. People live in stories. They do not understand their own experience through averages and standard deviations — they understand it through narrative logic: this happened, and because of that, this followed, and that is how I became who I am. Stories are how people make sense of what has happened to them. They are not less reliable than numbers; they are differently reliable. They reveal what numbers conceal: context, connection, emotion, the why behind the what.
In PNI, stories are collected and analysed systematically — but the analysis begins with the storytellers themselves. They connect their own stories to interpretations, patterns and feelings. That makes the narrative dimension of PNI inseparable from the participatory one: the story is not only the data, it is also the instrument through which participants articulate and examine their own knowledge.
I — Inquiry
The third word is inquiry — investigation, but in the broader, more open sense of the word. Not the execution of a predetermined protocol, but the genuine exploration of a question whose answer you do not yet know.
Inquiry implies curiosity. It implies a willingness to be surprised. It implies taking the process seriously, not just the outcome. In combination with participatory and narrative, it means the research is never finished until the participants themselves have gained something from it — insight, recognition, a conversation they did not expect.
Inquiry is also what distinguishes PNI from storytelling as a mere communication tool. We tell stories all the time. But inquiry — systematically questioning those stories, looking for patterns, returning findings to the community — is what makes it research. Rigorous and methodical, but also alive and responsive.
Three letters, one movement
PNI is more than a method. It is an attitude. A way of seeing the relationship between researcher and researched, between knowledge and experience, between what we know and how we come to know it. The P asks you to trust others. The N asks you to listen to how they speak. And the I asks you to remain genuinely curious — even when what you hear surprises you, unsettles you or challenges what you thought you knew. That is perhaps the most beautiful promise of PNI.
0
0 comments
More than research: PNI
powered by
skool.com/the-story-commons-community-9565
Learn in 4 weeks how to work with stories to better understand people, uncover patterns, and design meaningful change.
Suggested communities
Powered by