14d • General discussion
When should AI enter the process?
I came across a simple idea in some recent AI-in-education research that I think is worth playing with:
Human → AI → Human
The idea is that we don’t always need AI to be the first step.
We can:
First: Think, brainstorm, attempt, or create on our own.
Then: Bring in AI to critique, expand, explain, challenge, or help us see something we missed.
Finally: Come back as the human and decide what stays, what changes, and what gets thrown out.
I really like this because it moves us away from the conversation of:
“AI or no AI?”
and toward:
“Where should AI show up in the learning process?”
So I’m curious:
Think about one assignment, lesson, work task, or student-support activity you do.
Where would you put AI in the process — beginning, middle, end, or nowhere at all? And why?
There isn’t one right answer. I want to hear how you’re thinking about it.
0
1 comment
When should AI enter the process?
powered by
skool.com/the-ripple-effect-7351
A practical AI community for educators to save time, teach smarter, support learners, and build confidence with real tools and strategies.
Suggested communities
Powered by