I came across a simple idea in some recent AI-in-education research that I think is worth playing with: Human → AI → Human The idea is that we don’t always need AI to be the first step. We can: First: Think, brainstorm, attempt, or create on our own. Then: Bring in AI to critique, expand, explain, challenge, or help us see something we missed. Finally: Come back as the human and decide what stays, what changes, and what gets thrown out. I really like this because it moves us away from the conversation of: “AI or no AI?” and toward: “Where should AI show up in the learning process?” So I’m curious: Think about one assignment, lesson, work task, or student-support activity you do. Where would you put AI in the process — beginning, middle, end, or nowhere at all? And why? There isn’t one right answer. I want to hear how you’re thinking about it.