User
Write something
Pinned
This Is What Commitment Actually Looks Like
I just want to take a moment to say this... I’m genuinely proud of you. Not because this is easy. Not because you have it all figured out. But because you’re leaning into the work anyway. Adapting is uncomfortable. Learning new tools stretches you. Changing how you think, move, and operate takes effort. And most people avoid that. Most people wait until it feels simple. Until it feels familiar. Until someone else proves it first. You didn’t. You are committed to the tools. You are staying in the room. You choose to get better instead of staying comfortable. That tells me everything I need to know. When things change and you don’t opt out… When you feel resistance and lean in anyway… That’s what separates the few from the many. This is how real growth happens. Not overnight. Not perfectly. But consistently. Keep going. You’re exactly where you should be.
Easy Guide: Which AI should you use for your images? (ChatGPT vs. Nano Banana)
Hey everyone! 👋 I know AI image tools can feel overwhelming. Suddenly there are new versions dropping every week (like the new ChatGPT Image 1.5 that just came out!). To keep it simple, I tested the two biggest players so you don't have to guess. Here is the "Plain English" breakdown of which one you should use for your daily tasks. Option 1: ChatGPT (The "Fast Camera") Best for: Quick fun, social media posts, and simple ideas. Think of this like a Polaroid camera. You point, shoot, and get a great-looking picture instantly. - Use this if: You need a quick image for a Facebook post, a slide background, or just to brainstorm an idea. - Why beginners like it: It’s very forgiving. You can type a short sentence like "A cat wearing sunglasses on a beach," and it usually looks good on the first try. - The cool new feature: They added a "Refine" button where you can highlight just one part (like the cat's sunglasses) and change it without ruining the rest of the picture. Option 2: Nano Banana (The "Smart Designer") Best for: Consistency, text, and specific layouts. Think of this like hiring a patient graphic designer. It listens to specific instructions better. - Use this if: You are making a YouTube thumbnail where the text needs to be readable, or if you are creating a character (like a mascot) that needs to look the same in 5 different pictures. - Why pros like it: It is better at "logic." If you ask for a flowchart or a diagram, it actually tries to put the boxes in the right order. - The superpower: It can handle complex prompts where you describe exactly where things should go. Cheat Sheet: Which one for what? - Need a quick meme or funny pic? 👉 Go with ChatGPT. - Need a Thumbnail with text on it? 👉 Go with Nano Banana. - Need a logo or brand mascot? 👉 Go with Nano Banana (it remembers characters better!). - Need to change just the background of a photo? 👉 Go with ChatGPT. Homework: Try generating the same idea in both tools and post the results in the comments! I’d love to see which style you prefer.
Easy Guide: Which AI should you use for your images? (ChatGPT vs. Nano Banana)
Sabrina Romanoffs "Bonus session" is a 9 page PDF - that is all!?!
Dean Graziosi sold this course with "You get more of Sabrina Romanoff" and I was mind blowned of her session and thought: Yes, she will show us how we do - step by step - to create several social media post from one origianal and show us how we post it everywhere with help from AI. What we get: A 9 page PDF that is saying crap like "Ground yourself before prompting" and "do a mindset upgrae". Well that was the first 6 pages. Then it is 3 pages left where we get 5 geeral and easy prompts that we could figure out by our own. The two last pages is a micro plan of 1 week filled with nonsense and the last page is just Sabrinas name. So we got 1 page with 5 generic prompts. And I do not see how that promts can fullfille the promises giving: - She shows you how to go upstream—start with one painful problem, go deep with one model, and stack 40 tiny, compounding wins instead of hunting for one mythical agent. - You’ll see how she uses AI as three distinct partners—Brainstorming, Research, Sparring—so you stop getting generic drafts and start getting thinking you can ship. - The interactive blueprint (your private “how we really do it” packet) walks you through Sabrina’s field-tested plays: - the confidence-building career plan that turned anxiety into a two-year roadmap, - the Viral Hook Engine that breaks “200-view jail,” and the Solopreneur Distribution System that repurposes one video into platform-native content across six channels—on autopilot. - You’ll also build an AI Board of Directors (strategy, marketing, product, finance, ops) to pressure-test any plan before you spend a dollar, plus add Sabrina’s one-line upgrade—“Ask me clarifying questions…”—that immediately boosts the quality of every output." WHERE do we get all this? How can 1 page in a pdf file with 5 generic promts do everything that is promised above? I do not see anywhere how that will give me 40 wins, use the AI for brainstormning, research and sparring, build me a 2 year roadmap, a solopreneur distribution system that goes on autopilot, an AI Board of Directors.
Why I Switched from CHATGPT PLUS to GEMINI PRO (Now “Nautilus”)
After logging 300+hours of intensive AI use in the last six weeks, after the AI bootcamp, 40 days ago from Nov 6th, 2025, running real workflows—not demos—I made a decisive platform shift to GEMINI PRO. Below is the exact rationale, from my personal and practical use documented for transparency and repeatability at the request of some of my followers. ChatGPT — Limitations Observed in High-Intensity Use (300+ Hours of Practical Work) ✘ Inconsistent reliability during peak usage hours; frequent bottlenecks ✘ Constantly have to reopen new chats to continue an existing workflow ✘ Consistently forces the user to refresh the chat when it crashes ✘ Uses DALL·E for image generation (Inferior MCP connector) ✘ Very poor quality in image AI generation ✘ Uses report PDF generator, which is inaccurate and does not parse text properly ✘ Does not produce native video outputs in comparison to Gemini Pro VEO 3 or upcoming VEO 4 power ✘ Does not integrate like Gemini Pro with Google Videos, Products, and Workspace ✘ Does not check Gmail inside the chat interface ✘ Uses folders, but does not use Gems like Gemini Pro, which are sub-agents with rules, (Time Saver) Gemini Pro — Why I Transitioned (Now Operating as “Nautilus”) ✔ Exported ENTIRE history of conversations from ChatGPT to Gemini Pro very easily. ✔ Stronger long-context persistence across extended conversations ✔ Stable performance during sustained, high-intensity usage ✔ Supports structured agent orchestration with Gems ✔ Enables purpose-built autonomous agents (“Tritons”) ✔ Reduces prompt redundancy through retained role-specific logic ✔ Scales horizontally without performance collapse ✔ Better aligned with real business, automation, and execution workflows ✔ Superior image creation with Nana Banana Pro ✔ Superior creation of videos with VEO3 & VEO4 ✔ Checks Gmail inside Gemini Pro chat interface (Genesis Pro user face) ✔ Pulls YouTube videos directly inside the UI chatbox, which GPT does not do ✔ Grabs direct research from Google, which ChatGPT cannot do
Why I Switched from CHATGPT PLUS to GEMINI PRO (Now “Nautilus”)
Everyone on Skool is awesome. 😎
Been learning a lot on here. Meeting awesome people. Aiming to win as many small daily moments I can each day. Stacking the wins. Taking L’s on the chin. Let’s keep growing together. 🤝
Everyone on Skool is awesome. 😎
1-30 of 10,188
The AI Advantage
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins & Dean Graziosi - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI, gain "AI Confidence" and unlock real & repeatable results.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by