User
Write something
Pinned
🧭 AI Literacy Is Now a Responsibility: Turning Governance into Confidence
Many teams treat governance like a brake. The teams that win will treat it like a steering wheel. When expectations rise, confidence comes from preparedness, not avoidance. ------------- Context ------------- AI expectations are becoming more explicit across industries. Even teams that do not build AI products are being asked how they use AI, how data is handled, and how risk is managed. This shifts governance from optional to foundational. Not because of fear, but because trust increasingly determines speed. Organizations that can explain their AI usage clearly move faster with customers, partners, and internal teams. The risk is treating governance as paperwork. The opportunity is treating it as capability building. ------------- Literacy Is Not Training, It Is Shared Language ------------- AI literacy is not a one-time course. It is the ability to ask good questions in daily work. What is this system good at. Where does it fail. What data should it never see. Which outputs require verification. How do we escalate concerns. These questions create safety through understanding. When literacy is low, people use AI quietly. That secrecy increases risk. When literacy is shared, learning becomes collective and safer. Literacy is cultural infrastructure. ------------- Governance as Enablement, Not Control ------------- Good governance removes ambiguity. When people know which tools are approved, what data is allowed, and what checks are required, hesitation disappears. This is especially important as agents and automation become more common. Without governance, scaling stalls. With it, innovation accelerates inside clear boundaries. The most effective governance feels usable. It fits real workflows instead of theoretical ones. ------------- Minimum Viable Proof for AI Outputs ------------- As AI influences decisions, we need standards for trust. Minimum viable proof asks: what evidence is required before an AI output drives action? For low-risk work, the bar is low. For high-risk work, it is higher. Sources, audits, human sign-off, or reproducibility.
🧭 AI Literacy Is Now a Responsibility: Turning Governance into Confidence
Pinned
We Tested Claude Cowork for a Week. Here Are the Results...
The AI Advantage team spent a week testing Claude Cowork, and in this video, I break down what worked and what didn't in our testing. If you've been wondering exactly how you should be using Claude Cowork, this is the video for you!
Pinned
You either get the result or the upgrade.
Sometimes you’ll get the win. Other times you’ll get the lesson. That’s it. Not everything turns into a highlight. Not every effort turns into a payoff. But none of it is wasted. Because lessons turn into better decisions. Better decisions turn into better execution. Better execution turns into wins. Most people quit in the lesson phase because it feels like losing. It’s not. It’s just part of the process. So this week: Try the thing. Have the conversation. Make the offer. See what happens. Adjust. Go again. Quick check-in: What’s one uncomfortable action you will commit to taking this week?
🎙️ The New Interface is Human: Multimodal AI, Voice Agents, and the Return of Conversation
We thought AI would change work by making us better writers. It may change work more by making us better communicators. When AI can listen, speak, see, and respond in real time, the interface becomes conversation, and that shifts everything. ------------- Context ------------- One of the strongest trends in AI right now is the move toward multimodal interaction. Voice, text, images, and video are converging into a single experience. This reduces friction between intention and action, and it changes how work feels. In many organizations, the biggest bottleneck is translation. Turning conversations into tasks. Turning ideas into documentation. Turning meetings into decisions. Typing becomes the tax we pay to make work real. Voice and multimodal AI reduce that tax. But speed alone does not guarantee clarity. Without discipline, we risk accelerating confusion instead of resolving it. ------------- The Shift from Prompting to Briefing ------------- Text-based AI rewards clever prompts. Conversational AI rewards clear thinking. Briefing is a different skill. It involves context, constraints, audience, and desired outcomes. It feels less like operating a tool and more like delegating to a colleague. That makes AI more accessible, especially for people who never enjoyed “prompt engineering.” At the same time, natural speech can hide ambiguity. Casual phrasing often skips assumptions. So the skill gap shifts from who can phrase prompts to who can frame work clearly. Teams that develop shared briefing habits will compound value faster than teams that rely on individual prompt tricks. ------------- The Attention Problem We Are About to Create ------------- Conversational AI feels always available. That can be empowering, or overwhelming. If voice agents interrupt constantly, triage poorly, or encourage reactive behavior, they fragment attention. If designed well, they protect focus by absorbing noise and surfacing only what matters. This is a human performance issue. Efficiency without boundaries leads to burnout. Speed without recovery erodes judgment.
🎙️ The New Interface is Human: Multimodal AI, Voice Agents, and the Return of Conversation
How I solved a 1-month bug in 1 hour (by cheating on ChatGPT)
Stop limiting yourself to one LLM. 🛑 Here's why switching could have saved me a month of frustration. I spent almost a month stuck on a website issue. Went back and forth with ChatGPT and Claude—smart models, but neither could crack it. Then I tried something different: I asked Claude to summarize our entire conversation into a markdown file, dumped it into Gemini, and picked up right where I left off. Gemini solved it in an hour. 🤯 It was like bringing a fresh perspective into a cross-functional team meeting. Sometimes you need the engineer's view, sometimes the designer's. Different LLMs have different strengths—and different blind spots. Here's the thing that hit me: I was treating my AI tools like I had one coworker I kept asking about everything. Would you keep asking your marketing person to solve your database architecture problem? Probably not. So why do we default to one LLM for everything? Now I'm rethinking my whole approach: - ChatGPT for creative brainstorming 🎨 - Claude for systems thinking and structured docs 📝 - Gemini for technical problem-solving when I'm stuck 🛠️ - The cross-platform handoff? Dead simple. Export conversation summary → import to new LLM → keep moving. 👇 Question for the group: Are you stuck in a single-LLM relationship? What's your strategy for knowing when to switch models? I'm curious if anyone else has had breakthrough moments by bouncing between LLMs. Drop your experience below.
1-30 of 11,073
The AI Advantage
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by