Situations in practice teaches us that there are already many borderline cases where you can't decide which law should be applied. Example: Can I be injured in virtual reality? Theoretically NO, because it is physical, but haptic technology enables that if you put that suit on, and someone touches you in the metaverse, you will feel it realistic, as a physical injury. So what choice does the law have? None. Virtual reality needs its own set of law. Robotic Bill of Rights (harmonized at international level) that define what rights should robot have in the sense of boundaries and limitations, in order to keep them inside that boundaries, and guard human from its malfunction which caused damage or injuries, what is already happening.