🌎🔥 Let's light up the map! Where's everyone tuning in from? Drop your state below and let's see who's rocking it from coast to coast!👇

Can someone direct me to the video that was on this group site that address legalities and FDA. It was one of the best videos concerning stem cell facts. I can no longer find it on the site.

The Cell Count Guide is officially available in the Classroom. Learn how many stem cells your body really needs for safe joint therapy, and what red flags to avoid before paying for treatment. 📘 Go to Classroom → “Cell Count Guide” to read or download it. Drop your biggest stem cell question in the comments 👇

🧭 The Real Answer (In Plain English) It’s not that stem cell therapies don’t work. It’s that the U.S. FDA only approves treatments after a long, expensive process designed for pharmaceutical drugs. Most stem cell therapies today (especially MSCs) do not behave like drugs. They’re living cells, which makes them harder to standardize, package, and patent. To get FDA approval, a company must: ✔ Run multi-phase clinical trials (which cost $100M+ and take 7–10 years) ✔ Prove identical results across thousands of patients ✔ Own the therapy under a commercial license Most regenerative therapies are still in Phase I or II trials, meaning the science is strong, but big companies haven’t completed the approval path yet. 🧪 But Here’s the Catch… The science is already strong in areas like: - Osteoarthritis & joint inflammation - Autoimmune regulation - Graft vs Host Disease (approved in Japan & Europe) That’s why other countries (like Mexico, Japan, Panama, South Korea) allow regulated clinical use of MSCs under medical supervision — even while the U.S. waits for pharmaceutical-style approval. 📌 In Short: The U.S. isn’t saying “stem cells don’t work.” It’s saying: “Come back with a drug-level package.” And stem cells are not simple drugs. 🔍 Reference - Jayaram, P. et al. (2025). Ethical and Regulatory Considerations Related to Regenerative Medicine. HSS journal: the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. Comment your thoughts.

This name isn’t a rebrand. It’s a realignment. We have always been about impact. About access. About helping people discover what is possible with stem cells. The science is powerful but the movement is personal. “I Love Stem Cells” speaks from the heart of what we do and why we do it. It is simple. It is bold. It resonates with the people who matter most — those whose lives have been changed and those still looking for answers. We are not here to argue policy or chase trends. We are here to help more people say “I love stem cells” because they have seen the results for themselves. The mission is the same. The name just caught up.