Hard Questions - Straight Answers!
If you have more, or would like clarifications, comment below! “How will the police catch criminals?” Privacy doesn’t abolish policing; it restores targeted policing. Rebe11ion ends mass surveillance of the innocent, not lawful investigation of the guilty.Warrants, evidence, and forensic work continue exactly as before — only with sharper focus.Bulk data dragnets bury clues; precision policing finds them. In short: Investigate crimes, not everyone. “Isn’t this a criminals’ charter?” Criminals depend on corrupted power and insider access, not encryption.We store no data, hold no funds, and mediate no exchanges, so there’s nothing to misuse. Law enforcement still acts on evidence from victims, witnesses, and warrants; what disappears, is political manipulation of private data. In short: We don’t hide criminals — we remove the hiding places of the powerful. “You’ll stop the state collecting taxes.” Rebe11ion blocks coercion, not contribution. People fund what they trust; transparency and efficiency raise compliance more than fear ever has. Revenue enforcement still exists — through payrolls, property, and voluntary declarations through Tax Returns — When taxpayers can see outcomes, they pay gladly. governments should perhaps encourage us to 'invest' by showing us a positive story. In short: Transparency turns taxation into partnership, not persecution. “You undermine social justice.” Centralisation has widened inequality by handing data—and therefore power—to elites. Rebe11ion is deliberately priced for the weak, protecting ordinary users from exploitation.Our role isn’t to redistribute wealth; it’s to remove the digital leverage that keeps citizens dependent. Real fairness starts with equal privacy. In short: Privacy is the foundation of justice, not its enemy. “You’re creating a parallel legal system.” We create no laws and issue no rulings. Courts, constitutions, and due process still govern every act committed through our network. Rebe11ion is simply the lawful environment in which those institutions can work without censorship or surveillance bias.