When a patient isn't getting better, it's natural to ask, “What's the next medication we should try?” But before making another change, I think it's worth stepping back and asking a different question: Have we fully understood why the current approach isn't working? This topic was suggested by our community member Shai Nico, who wanted to learn more about treatment-resistant depression. I appreciate questions like this because they give us an opportunity to explore the clinical reasoning behind the treatment decisions we make every day. Treatment-resistant depression requires more than cycling through medications. It calls for a closer look at the diagnosis, the adequacy of previous treatment trials, the patient's response, and the factors that may be complicating recovery. 🧠 Start with the basics. Was the dose appropriate? Was the medication taken consistently? Was there enough time to evaluate the response? 🔎 Revisit the diagnosis. Bipolar spectrum symptoms, anxiety, trauma, substance use, sleep problems, and medical conditions may all affect the clinical picture. 🩺 Match the next step to the response. Optimizing treatment, switching medications, and considering augmentation are different strategies. The right choice depends on the patient's history, tolerability, and goals. 💡 Know when to broaden the conversation. Psychotherapy, TMS, ECT, and ketamine-based treatments may be appropriate for selected patients, depending on the clinical situation. ❤️ Don't lose sight of the person behind the diagnosis. Symptom scores matter, but so do relationships, daily functioning, and the ability to participate in life again. Treatment resistance doesn't mean a patient is untreatable. It means we need to reassess carefully, think critically, and build the next step around the individual. Thank you, Shai, for bringing this topic to our community. Your question may also help other clinicians who are navigating similar cases. For my fellow clinicians: What do you reassess first when a patient isn't responding as expected?