12h • Symptoms, & Diagnosis
The PSA debate just ended — and early detection won
This week, the Cochrane Collaboration — the organisation that produces the most rigorous health evidence reviews in the world — published an updated analysis of PSA screening. Six trials. 800,000 men.
Their conclusion: PSA screening reduces prostate cancer deaths with "moderate certainty."
This is significant because it was the 2013 Cochrane review that helped push PSA screening out of favour in the first place. Doctors became cautious. Men used it as a reason to wait. Guidelines pulled back.
The 2026 update has reversed that.
Two fewer deaths per 1,000 screened. Overdiagnosis is still a real consideration — more cancers get detected, some of which might not have caused harm. That nuance matters and it belongs in every doctor conversation.
But the headline is clear: the test works.
For the families in this community — if the man in your life has been using "the science is uncertain" as his reason not to get tested, that argument just ran out.
My friend's increasing PSA levels helped him to detect cancer when it was still localised to the apex of his prostate. He had HIFU (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound) surgery and is still cancer free 5 years later. So early detection does work.
Has anyone here used this kind of research to start a conversation with someone who was resistant to getting a PSA test? What finally got through to them?
0
0 comments
The PSA debate just ended — and early detection won
powered by
skool.com/prostate-paladin-4886
Prostate awareness for men and women. The prostate does not belong in the shadows with no understanding. Awareness is the key.
Suggested communities
Powered by