Agree with Rollo's research and documentation of Hypergamy but I very respectfully ask - is it really Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks? I was watching Tate's PHD course and he simply said Men and Women exchange Attention for Sex. At the risk of sounding a little Blue Pill, don't women really just want Beta Bucks AND Alpha Bucks - it's just a man's attention is as valueable as his status and women can only buy an Alpha's high value attention by paying for it with sex. Whereas she'll happily friendzone a Beta Chump if he's willingly offering the same 'FREE Attention' that Alan Roger Currie warned against.
This makes Dating / Relationships sound extremely transactional but even Myron says that women always treat sex like a value loaded exchange ('What am I getting in return???'), and that 'All women are golddiggers, some are just better than others at hiding the shovel'.
Even if she gets with Chris Hemsworth or Jason Momoa, she will still have a shot clock on how long she'll bang him until she gets Attention (Resources) in return.
Like Aaron Clarey says - maybe women simply aren't into the opposite sex like men are. Ultimately women's life strategy is just 'Unlimited access to unlimited attention'. Cindy Meston and David Buss' book 'Why Women Have Sex' can pretty much be boiled down to... 'TO RECEIVE ATTENTION'.
Perhaps, Bad Boy Alpha traits are Beta Buck traits because Height and Muscularity ultimately indicate the ability to protect and provide?