User
Write something
Court Talk is happening in 6 days
Pinned
Court Talk Recordings & More
🔥 COURT TALK RECORDINGS ARE NOW COMING TO PREMIUM ⚖️ The first Court Talk class recording is officially uploaded to Skool! 📍 Where to find it: Go to the Litigation Classroom → Court Talk folder. Each recording will be labeled by the date it was recorded + the title of the lesson, so it will be easy to keep track of classes and go back to specific topics later. I will continue giving members opportunities to hop on Court Talk LIVE for FREE when we hold live classes. But I know everyone can’t always make it because of work, family, court, or life in general. That’s where Juris Vitae Premium comes in. For $25/month, Premium members will have access to the recorded classes so you can learn on your own time — whether you’re studying at home, preparing for court, or simply listening during your car ride. 🎁 FIRST-MONTH PREMIUM BONUS Right now, I only have the first recording uploaded, and I want to make sure the people contributing to Premium are receiving value while I continue building the library. So during this first month, when you sign up for Premium, you’ll receive: 📚 ONE FREE BOOK OF YOUR CHOICE from the 3 books currently available in my store. The books are currently $30 each, so that bonus alone is worth more than the $25 monthly contribution. I’ll also be hosting occasional sales on the books, so I recommend grabbing them when those sales come around. 🎂 For my birthday on September 6, I’ll be offering a special 25%–50% OFF sale. But Premium is going to be much more than recorded classes. As I work through different cases and research court rules, statutes, procedures, evidence, appellate issues, constitutional questions, motions, and litigation strategies, I’m constantly gathering information that may benefit other members. Instead of keeping all of that information in my personal notes, I’m going to start pouring it into the Premium section. Premium members can expect: ⚖️ Court Talk class recordings 📚 Deeper educational materials and research 🔎 Rules, statutes, procedures, cases, and useful resources
Court Talk Recordings & More
Videos
Some good videos to watch.
Rights vs. Causes of Action
Understanding How the Bill of Rights Is Enforced One of the most important things to understand in constitutional litigation is the difference between a right, a cause of action**, and a remedy. #1. The Constitution Gives You the Right The Bill of Rights identifies protections against government action. Examples: * First Amendment — speech, religion, assembly, petition * Fourth Amendment — unreasonable searches and seizures * Fifth Amendment — due process and other protections * Sixth Amendment — rights of the accused * Eighth Amendment — excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment The constitutional amendment is generally the **source of the right. For example: Fourth Amendment = the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. But identifying a constitutional right does not answer the next question: How do you bring that violation before a court? That is where the cause of action comes in. --- # 2. The Cause of Action Is the Legal Vehicle When a state or local government official violates a federal constitutional right, one of the primary civil enforcement statutes is: # 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Section 1983 allows a person to bring a civil action when someone acting under color of state law deprives that person of rights secured by the Constitution or federal law. Think of it this way: Constitution = Right § 1983 = Cause of Action / Enforcement Vehicle Damages, injunction, declaration = Remedy --- # 3. Example — Fourth Amendment Suppose a state police officer unlawfully arrests someone without probable cause. The legal structure might be: Right: Fourth Amendment Violation: Unreasonable seizure / false arrest Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Possible Remedy: Damages, declaratory relief, or appropriate injunctive relief. A properly identified claim might therefore be titled: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Unreasonable Seizure in Violation of the Fourth Amendment Notice the distinction. You are not simply alleging: “Violation of § 1983.”
3
0
Rights vs. Causes of Action
Weekend game on!!
🤣 minus make up on and a tiara. The shirts on and my belts tight. Sunglasses are in Ai evade mode, With the Keyboards at the helm, a pen is in my royal hand ready to wield. Time to speak into the microphone a song of buck-tastic love or one about to do the screwing, welcome to friday fellow nationals!
1
0
False Dilemma in Police Encounters: “Show Me ID or Get Arrested”
False Dilemma in Police Encounters: “Show Me ID or Get Arrested” Lesson Objective This lesson teaches students how to recognize a false dilemma during a police encounter and, more importantly, how that language may reveal that a consensual encounter has turned into a **Fourth Amendment seizure**. The central question is not merely: “Did the officer ask for identification?” The better questions are: Was compliance voluntary? If not, when did the encounter become a detention, and what legal justification existed for that detention? --- # I. What Is a False Dilemma? A false dilemma, sometimes called a false dichotomy, occurs when someone presents only two alternatives even though additional alternatives actually exist. The structure looks like this: > You must choose A or B. When the actual possibilities may be: > A, B, C, D, or no action at all. In a police encounter, the problem becomes particularly important when an officer presents a **voluntary request as though compliance is legally mandatory**. --- # II. The Scenario A man leaves a bar and stands outside waiting for his Uber. He is not driving. He is not fighting. He is not bothering anyone. He tells the officer: > “I’m just waiting for my Uber.” The officer asks: > “Let me see your ID.” The man responds: > “I don't want to provide my ID. I'm just waiting for my Uber.” The officer then says: > “We can do this one of two ways. You show me your ID, or you get arrested.” The man again refuses. The officer detains him and ultimately arrests him. --- # III. Identify the False Dilemma The officer has presented two purported choices: ### Option A Provide identification. ### Option B Be arrested. But those may not be the only lawful possibilities. Depending on the circumstances and applicable state law, another possibility may be: ### Option C Decline the officer's request and continue waiting for the Uber. Another may be: ### Option D Ask whether the encounter is voluntary:
1-30 of 37
powered by
Juris vitae
skool.com/juris-vitae-4890
Juris Vitae = “Law of Life”: stewards learning their inherent rights, due process, faith, liberty, and self-governance to stand in truth in community.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by