I want to spend the session on something practical rather than theoretical. The standards that govern safety in digital systems are open for consultation, and I'd rather this community responded to it properly than watched it pass. Here's what I've noticed over thirty years. Clinicians tend to assume a consultation wants polished policy language, so they don't respond. What it actually wants is the thing you'd say in a corridor: the alert everyone silently overrides, the workaround that quietly became standard practice, the moment a system did exactly what it was designed to do and it still wasn't safe. That detail cannot be produced from a desk. It only comes from you. So bring one. A real example, however small or awkward. We'll look at what the consultation is asking, work out where clinical evidence carries the most weight, and I'll show you how to structure a response so it gets read. If you can't make it live, drop your example in the comments and I'll pick it up in the session. 20:00 tonight.