User
Write something
⚠️ Why Health Headlines Sound Terrifying — Even When the Actual Risk Is Tiny
Hi everyone — quick note as we get settled here. We’re intentional about the groups we join. We try to participate only in communities where we feel we can add value, offer a parallel industry perspective, and contribute insights that are genuinely useful to the discussion — not distract from it. Our goal isn’t to poach members, redirect traffic, or conflict with the culture of any group. We aim to share perspectives, research, and discussion points that complement what’s already happening here. That said, we fully understand we won’t be for everyone. If any post, comment, or topic ever feels off-tone or misaligned, we’re very open to feedback. A quick DM or note is always welcome, and we’re happy to adjust how we engage within the group. Appreciate the space, and looking forward to contributing where it makes sense. (Part 1 of our TPDB series: Risk — The Numbers They Don’t Want You to Understand) If you’ve ever read a headline that made you feel a sudden jolt of fear — “risk doubles,” “danger spikes,” “linked to cancer,” “raises mortality” — there’s a good chance you were reacting not to facts, but to a statistical illusion most people don’t realize they’ve fallen for. Almost nobody is taught how to read risk properly. And that’s exactly why this trick works so well. 🧮 Two Different Numbers — Two Very Different Realities You’ll never understand health statistics (or media manipulation) until you understand these two terms: 1. Absolute Risk This is the actual, real-world probability that something will happen. Example: “3 out of 1,000 people will experience this in the next 10 years.” Absolute risk tells you the size of the danger in real life. 2. Relative Risk This is a comparison — how much higher or lower a risk is in one group compared to another. Example: “People who do X have twice the risk of Y.” Relative risk tells you how groups differ, but it hides the actual numbers beneath the comparison. 🔥 Where the Manipulation Happens If your absolute risk goes from 2 in 1,000 → 3 in 1,000, that is a tiny absolute change…
0
0
⚠️ Why Health Headlines Sound Terrifying — Even When the Actual Risk Is Tiny
Is anyone using this?
Just wondering if anyone is even using this app as no answers to question and no new posts from Sanjeev.
0
0
Video from Sanjeev ☺️
Most healing compounds break down before your body can even use them. BPC-157 is different. It’s a naturally occurring protein fragment found in the stomach that’s stable in gastric acid, which means it can survive digestion and still reach the bloodstream - one of the few compounds of its kind that doesn’t require an injection. That’s also why people often feel results more quickly - improved gut repair, reduced inflammation, and faster recovery at the tissue level have all been documented in early studies (e.g., Sikiric et al., Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2018). When a molecule works with your biology instead of fighting it, you notice the difference.
0
0
Video from Sanjeev ☺️
Going Nowhere... Getting Somewhere...
I just finished reading this incredible book and I have to say it really resonated with me. One idea that stuck with me was that transformation isn’t about doing everything perfectly it’s about showing up, staying curious, and being honest with yourself.
My GLP1 journey begins
I started GLP-1 about two weeks ago and I’m already seeing results! I’ve gone from 121 lbs to 116, and my appetite has definitely decreased. But honestly, I’m most excited about how it’s helping with my PCOS! 💪✨
1-18 of 18
Longevity and Biohacking Labs
Science-based community led by Dr. Sanjeev Goel to help high-performers boost energy, slow aging, and optimize mind + body for longevity.
Powered by