User
Write something
Weekly AI Community Meetup is happening in 4 days
Most AI projects do not fail because of the technology. They fail because they start with the technology
. The real shift is from “Where can we use AI?” to “Which business problem is worth solving?” AI creates value when organisations: Fix inefficient processes before automating them Move beyond endless pilot projects Prioritise measurable business outcomes Invest in data quality, skills and organisational readiness Keep human trust, originality and creativity at the centre The winners in AI adoption will not be those using the most tools. They will be those solving the right problems. What is the biggest barrier to real AI value in your organisation: strategy, data, skills or execution? Share your perspective in the comments.
1
0
Most AI projects do not fail because of the technology. They fail because they start with the technology
The biggest shift in AI learning is not technical. It is an identity shift.
Stop asking: “What course should I watch next?” Start asking: “What will I build next?” The DDS Builder Codex begins with an identity-first foundation: intentional learning, active participation, visible progress, and continuous building. Learn. Build. Share. Elevate. Repeat. That is how learners become builders.
1
0
The biggest shift in AI learning is not technical. It is an identity shift.
📊 If you can't measure your AI model's performance, you can't optimize it. ⚡
Without evaluation, building AI applications is mostly just guesswork and opinions. 🧪 📍 This past Saturday in our Decoding Data Science *AI Residency (Cohort-10)* masterclass with Mohammad Arshad Sir, we tackled one of the most critical parts of building real-world **AI: LLM Evaluation and Observability.** It’s easy to get a chatbot to answer one or two questions well in a notebook. But how do you know it won't hallucinate or deliver overly wordy answers when deployed to real users? 💡 To test this, I built and evaluated a specialized Recipe & Food Safety Assistant using #LangSmith. Here is what I put into practice/experiments: ⏩ Building Golden Datasets: Created a grounded benchmark set of 34 targeted Q&As covering FDA food safety rules and cooking guidelines. ⏩ LLM-as-a-Judge: Set up custom evaluators to automatically grade responses on two key metrics—Correctness and Conciseness. ⏩ Observability & Experiments: Traced full execution paths to track latency (P50/P99) and token costs across multiple experiment runs with models like gpt-4.1-nano. 🔹 Iterating on system prompts and measuring the exact impact was eye-opening. Seeing the correctness score jump from 86% to 91% across runs proved that systematic measurement beats random prompting every single time. ✅ Building connected, context-aware AI is one thing—making sure it behaves predictably in production is where the real engineering happens. Excited to take these evaluation workflows into multi-agent systems next! 🚀 Grateful for the continuous hands-on learning in the DDS AI Academy! 💻 DDS Business Circle #GenerativeAI #LangSmith #AIResidency #LLMEvaluation #MachineLearning #AIEngineering #LangChain #LLMObservability #DataScience #AIBuilder #AIIntegration #DataPipelines #PythonDevelopers #AgenticAI #Upskilling #ContinuousLearnings
📊 If you can't measure your AI model's performance, you can't optimize it. ⚡
Agentic AI is moving from answering questions to supporting full clinical pathways.
Systems such as MIRA and AMIE point toward a future where AI can assist with history-taking, diagnosis, treatment planning, medication safety, and longitudinal care. The real opportunity is not replacing clinicians—it is giving them faster, more consistent, and data-informed decision support. Healthcare may become one of the most meaningful applications of agentic AI. What will matter most: accuracy, safety, bias control, explainability, and human oversight.
Agentic AI is moving from answering questions to supporting full clinical pathways.
AI-native engineering requires a different mindset.
Traditional software is built for deterministic outputs. AI systems are probabilistic, variable, and sometimes uncertain. The shift is clear: Testing → Continuous evaluation Defensive programming → Grounding and guardrails Binary correctness → Calibrated confidence One-time QA → Continuous observability and tracing Reliable AI is not about eliminating uncertainty. It is about designing systems that can measure, manage, and respond to it.
AI-native engineering requires a different mindset.
1-10 of 10
powered by
Decoding Data Science
skool.com/decoding-data-science-6929
Learn AI, data science, and career growth through practical workshops, mentoring, challenges, and a supportive community.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by