20-hour edits getting less than 1000 views? Happens to nearly everyone that starts a channel.
But that doesn't mean you're guaranteed to fail. Even a brand new channel, making it's first video, can get millions of views. @PrimateEconomics did it. 15M views on the first short, and there's DOZENS of copycat channels for them popping up right now. Here's why:
The Concept Holds The Power:
YouTube sends views to videos that have strong engagement data. View time, comments, likes, shares, etc. Any video can achieve this. HOW a video gets metrics is simply attention + interest... which you could break down into Expected pay-off vs. Actual pay-off... not including force multipliers like curiosity and novelty... but I digress. Let's just look at Expectation vs. Result for now, and by the end of this ~2min read post, you'll get a great deal of clarity on this.
TL;DR for this section: subconscious brain works fast, overrides conscious thought, videos get less views if subconscious doesn't care.
Anything your viewer can possibly imagine that your video is about, comes from your video concept. Said differently, whatever you make videos about, your viewer will draw automatic conclusions, based on their own past experiences, about that video idea/concept. What does that mean in terms of retention? That means the IDEA ITSELF holds ALL the retention power of the video. Based on visual/auditory cues that YOU (the creator) generate, your audience automatically, in less than a second and without conscious thought, generates an expectation about what comes next. Based on THAT generation of expectation, each individual completes a fast "value judgement" = "Is this going to be worth it?" If they don't think so, they skip. If they do think so, they give you a few more seconds. That's the viewership attention loop.
The case study today, Primate Economics, did this beautifully. Their very first YouTube short on the channel went viral immediately. Since April 9th 2025, it has hit over 15M views.
The video concept was "inflation". Americans have been very on edge about inflation this year. "Will I be able to pay for my groceries?" --> "what is this country coming to?", etc. These are the very real fears and worries around the concept of inflation. Inflation, itself, as a concept, had a high emotional charge.
By the way, this is all describing Daniel Kahneman's System 1, "Fast thinking" (surprise, I'm not making this up!) This system uses context clues and past experience to draw rapid conclusions (at the cost of accuracy) about a given stimulus. In this case, the Inflation video. Again, this happens at the scale of MILLISECONDS. 100ms = 0.1 seconds. We can generally make conclusions at around 800ms, give or take per person.
Within the first second, the creator used "under produced" child-like drawings, monkeys as symbols of simplicity, and overly "dumbed down" speech. The result? The viewer is immediately hit with 3 key "cues" that guide them to this conclusion: "This video will be as stupidly simple as possible, and I'll learn what Inflation actually is."
Concept + Context Clues = Expectation.
As a topic for another day, the expectation ITSELF now carries the weight. You can set-up bad expectations as easily as good expectations, but comment if you want more info on that. Anyway...
So, the Concept + the automatic association of the viewer became a high value expectation. BUT WHAT'S MORE, is that he OVERDELIVERED on that expectation. The Pay-Off of the video (what the viewer actually got by staying to watch) was fully aligned with that automatically inferred set-up. But the creator also gave the viewer all the different types of inflation that can exist. This literally "leveled up" the viewers understanding in an instant. That desire to UNDERSTAND an emotionally challenging concept, paired with quick easy wins, created a dopaminergic effect. In other words, it was highly SATISFYING to watch. High satisfaction = engagement metrics = YouTube shares your video as much as it possibly can.
Does this all make sense?
The set-up is created within the first milliseconds of your video. The Concept of the video itself tells the viewer if it's worth watching or not. The pay-off of the video, the way you deliver what the viewer wants, determines their overall satisfaction with the video. Viewer satisfaction = exponential growth.
What do you think about this?