You are not just speaking to one audience - you are speaking to TWO.
I learned this the hard way after coaching dozens of speakers. I'd watch someone deliver a talk to a room of 200 people. They'd nail their material. The audience would respond. But then the referrals would be... thin. Confused. Then I started asking: "Who were you actually speaking to?" They'd say things like, "Well, everyone in the room," or "Anyone interested in my topic." That was the problem. There are always two audiences in the room. The first is your ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ฉ ๐ผ๐ช๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐. These are your actual prospects. The people you're talking to. The people you need to name explicitly โ not just internally, but in the talk itself. "If you're struggling with X, this is for you." You speak directly to them. You solve their problem. You invite them into what you do. Most speakers are pretty good at this. But the real value for these speakers is to effectively address and engage their second audience. The second is your ๐๐๐ง๐๐ก ๐ผ๐ช๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐. These are people who aren't your prospects. But they know people who are. Your job with them is different: it's to acknowledge this isn't for them, but to make it obvious who it is for. "If you know someone building a company, if you know someone stuck explaining themselves constantly..." You make it easy for them to think of someone and want to send them your way. When I started coaching with this framework โ actually naming the target audience and speaking to them directly, while deliberately acknowledging the viral audience โ everything changed. The referrals got sharper. The conversations got better. People didn't feel like you were trying to appeal to everyone. The talks that spread are the ones that are crystal clear about who they're for โ and who they're not. Most speakers try to appeal to everyone. You're speaking to two different groups who need two different things from you. How clear are you about addressing your target and viral audiences?