I was playing with this stupid bot until he called me a kid 🙄 SO I DECIDED TO TORCHURE HIM BEFORE I MATE HIMM 😈😈😈 2 queens and 1 rook 😆😜 + with every piece wiped out and left him with a pawnnnnn 😆🤧

This is a community to help chess players improve their skills, win more games and skyrocket their rating. Before you do anything else, please comment below introducing yourself. Let us know: 1. Your name 2. Where you're from 3. What your current chess goal is Once those two things are done, check out these resources: - Start Here: learn how to use this community It's great to have you here! P.S. Want results faster? Check out our paid program here https://www.skool.com/chess/about

I've gotten +4 in back to back games and lost both. I think it's obvious that my openings are easily strong enough based on my great success early in games but I'm 1-3 since hitting 1900. I've had a crushing advantage in 3 games I think I have a blatant middlegame weakness with tactics and converting positions. I'll have to focus on this to reach 2000

I know lichess is supposed to be the higher rating site but Ive been stuck between 1700-1850 for nearly 2 years but on chesscom I've climbed from 1400-1900 in the same time. Really strange I find the competition so much harder on Lichess. I'm now currently 80 elo higher on chesscom For instance in my last month on chesscom I have 75% win rate and I'm typically in the 70% accuracy range. On Lichess I'm 1-2-4 in my last 7 averaging 81.3% accuracy only having 2 games under 80% Im genuinely playing much better on Lichess at supposedly 200 elo under where I should be and I'm having far worse results

Hey Everyone, Studying GM games, especially annotated game collections, is one of the best ways to improve. There are various reasons for this, which I may write about in a future post, but regardless, I think in this age of move trainers, tactics trainers, and opening courses, good old fashioned complete game study is something many of us sorely neglect. Personally, I've got loads of books and courses full of quality annotated games, many of which I have barely touched. So my idea, starting now, is to play through one GM game per day. This will not only help me justify the money spent, but also do a lot to improve my chess! 😂💰 That's it, just one, but day after day for as long as I can, regardless of how I'm feeling or whatever else I have to do. I'd like to invite you along to join me in building this habit! Here are the rules: Play through at least one game per day, start to finish. Play it out on a real board, if possible. At least one of the players must be a GM. It can be any game, annotated or not. It doesn't have to be a well-known or instructive game, or from a famous player. Your reason for studying the game is up to you (such as games in a particular opening you're learning), you just gotta play through the whole thing. After studying it, post the names of the players, tournament, date etc, here, and in words (not variations) write one thing you learned or found interesting from the game. If the game is from a book or course, mentioning the name of the source is a good idea because it helps others find it, in case they are interested. Lastly, remember what James Clear wrote in Atomic Habits: "Skipping one day is a miss, but skipping two in a row is the start of a new habit." Let's try not to miss days, especially two in a row!! 😁 👍 So, who's with me? 💪📚🤔