Team:
Tell me if this would be “ethical” versus “business” smart practice.
And https://www.unitedforalice.org/alice-income-status-tool websites to see where you can pay the least for your employees not worrying about “high-turnover” because there’s always “someone” else looking for a job and knows how to get government support to pay their bills and make ends meet… And you know that when you higher someone as a manager type position it puts their paycheck at or past their benefits cliff leading them to have problems and either asking (demanding) for a reduction in payment or major payment hike (or they just quit knowing a major payment hike isn’t likely).
(But honestly you could afford that because you’re making “bank” making that extra money “go on mission” you’re not paying your employees with…)
Would you feel you’re being ethical or unethical in your business decisions and practices “preying” on the lower income community expectations?
(Although everyone similar to you is doing the same thing?)
I mean, you’re the CEO right? You are the one “appealing to your stock board members right”?
To cut corners instead of offering insurance you leave it to the government to provide (just pay it back in my government taxes..)
These are acceptable concepts because you need those additional funds for the CEO massive bonus and R &. D expansion expenses.
Right I thought it was appropriate and proper.
And if the local government threatened to tax me more I can just move somewhere else to just stick a middle finger to them.
Because after all, “I AM THE ONE EMPLOYING THEIR CITIZENS DOING THEM A FAVOR!” And I “graciously” put on small events for the community I employ everyone at for the small cost of 5% business revenue that I also now get to write off as a charity/business related expense.
WIN WIN right?
Do these business “practices” seem to “sustain” current business practices of corporate management America?
Would you agree to follow similar business practice models at the expense of the lower community income generations?