No-code vs. Developer-built stack for AI startup?
I've been tasked to assist an AI-native startup focused on compliance automation in the pharmaceutical industry — think agents that handle tasks like medical information triage, promotional material review, and regulatory prep.
Right now, I’m at a fork in the road and would love your perspective:
Option 1:
I can build the MVP entirely in Make.com, n8n, Pinecone, OpenAI, etc. — fast, modular, and flexible. I have no-code experience, and the workflows aren’t super complex (yet). I’d use email triggers, agentic RAG, and structured responses + weekly reports.
Option 2:
Bring in a dev/team to help build a more "proper" backend (Node, Supabase, Postmark, Pinecone, etc.), with custom APIs, more robustness, and longer-term scalability in mind.
So here’s the real question:
If you were launching a high-trust, B2B AI product for enterprise (compliance-heavy) clients — would you stay no-code until revenue, or go developer-built from day one?
I'd love some insight from those who've been here, done that!
4
5 comments
Alan Alston
3
No-code vs. Developer-built stack for AI startup?
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
A community built to master no-code AI automations. Join to learn, discuss, and build the systems that will shape the future of work.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by