6h • General Discussion 💬
Fortune 500 Wanted $500/Month - Came Back at $10,000/Month Six Months Later 🔥
Large insurance company wanted claims automation for $500/month budget.
I sent them to an offshore competitor.
They came back 6 months later ready to pay $10,000/month.
THE INITIAL INQUIRY:
Processing 3,200 insurance claims monthly. Manual review taking 45 minutes per claim.
Me: "Document automation can reduce that to 8 minutes per claim."
Them: "Perfect. Our budget is $500 monthly for the solution."
THE MATH THAT DIDN'T WORK:
Their waste:
- 3,200 claims monthly
- 45 minutes manual review each
- 2,400 hours total monthly
- At $65/hour loaded staff cost
- Monthly waste: $156,000
My automation saves: $140,000+ monthly
Their offered budget: $500/month
That's 0.3% of the value delivered.
Impossible to build quality solution for that.
THE DECISION:
Me: "That budget won't work for the complexity and compliance requirements. I know a great offshore team that might fit your range. Let me connect you."
Them: "You're actually turning down work?"
Me: "I'm pointing you toward better fit. My minimum for insurance claims automation is $3,500 monthly due to the compliance and accuracy requirements."
Them: "We'll try the offshore team. Thanks for the referral."
THE 6-MONTH TIMELINE:
Month 1-2: Offshore team builds for $500/month
Month 3: Solution accuracy hits 72% (insurance requires 95%+ for compliance)
Month 4: Support becomes impossible (timezone gaps, language barriers)
Month 5: Errors in claim processing trigger compliance audit
Month 6: Offshore team quits project (overwhelmed, underpaid)
THE CALLBACK:
Procurement Director: "The offshore solution didn't work out. Can we revisit your pricing?"
Me: "Sure. For your claim volume and compliance requirements, my rate is $10,000 monthly."
Them: "That's 20X what we budgeted!"
Me: "And it's 6% of what you're currently wasting on manual processing. How did the $500 solution work out?"
Them: "Point taken. When can you start?"
THE QUALITY DIFFERENCE:
Budget offshore solution:
- 72% accuracy (unacceptable for insurance)
- Frequent downtime
- No compliance documentation
- Support during their business hours only
My solution:
- 96.8% accuracy (meets insurance requirements)
- Robust error handling
- Complete audit trail for compliance
- 24/7 monitoring and support
CURRENT STATUS (18 MONTHS RUNNING):
- Monthly fee: $10,000
- Initial setup: $12,000
- Claims processed monthly: 3,200
- Accuracy maintained: 96.8%
- Compliance incidents: Zero
- Referrals generated: 2 other insurance divisions
TOTAL REVENUE FROM THIS CLIENT:
Setup: $12,000
Monthly: $10,000 × 18 months = $180,000
Total: $192,000
From walking away from the $500/month offer.
SIGNS YOU'RE TALKING TO A BUDGET BUYER:
- Budget is less than 5% of their actual waste
- Focus on price before understanding the problem
- Never paid for professional automation before
- Expect enterprise quality at freelance prices
- Shopping multiple vendors simultaneously
WHAT TO DO WITH BUDGET BUYERS:
1. Calculate their actual waste (show the real numbers)
2. If they still insist on budget pricing, refer to cheaper alternative
3. Stay in touch with monthly check-in emails
4. Be ready when their cheap solution fails (and it will)
5. Don't negotiate your rates down (protect your positioning)
They'll either learn the lesson and come back, or stay in budget tier forever (and you don't want that client anyway).
CURRENT CLIENT QUALITY METRICS:
- Average annual client value: $6,800
- Clients from "walked away then returned": 3
- Average time before return: 5.5 months
- Their second offer vs first offer: 6.2X higher
What budget client do you need to walk away from to make room for quality clients?
7
4 comments
Fortune 500 Wanted $500/Month - Came Back at $10,000/Month Six Months Later 🔥
skool.com/ai-automation-society
A community built to master no-code AI automations. Join to learn, discuss, and build the systems that will shape the future of work.
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
+5431
2
+2158
3
+2100
4
+1596
5
🔥
+1271
Powered by