Our AI media buyer cut lead costs by ~20%.
Same offers.
Same platform (Meta).
Same business.
Only difference:
AI-generated creatives vs traditional images.
60-day results:
AI media buyer (AI creatives):
$16,708 spend → 395 leads → 107 appointments
$42 CPL / $156 CPA
Traditional approach:
$18,660 spend → 354 leads → 95 appointments
$52 CPL / $196 CPA
What that means:
• ~20% cheaper leads
• ~21% cheaper appointments
• More volume with LESS spend
This wasn’t just “better creatives.”
The AI media buyer:
• Analyzed ad libraries + winning patterns
• Generated branded images using trained models
• Launched and tested variations automatically
• Identified winners based on real performance
• Created new variations from winners
• Scaled what works, cut what doesn’t
No designer.
No manual testing cycles.
Just continuous optimization.
Most people try to find one winning ad.
An AI media buyer keeps producing them.
If you’re still running ads manually…
You’re competing against systems that improve every hour on autopilot.
If you want to test it on your campaigns, dm.
2
0 comments
Dima Citizen
4
Our AI media buyer cut lead costs by ~20%.
AI Agents & Automations
skool.com/ai-agents-openclaw-1063
Ai agents builders sharing real agent setups, cost optimization, configs, and advanced workflows. Build smarter AI with hands on support.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by