Bigger picture about AI coding vs No code
Hey @Zubair Kakakhel thanks for creating this group, I’m really looking forward to the discussions and content here! I’m really curious to hear your thoughts on the bigger picture. Yes you told the story of a few clients switching to AI code and leaving Bubble/no code. In terms of your reasons for changing your agency approach, is your new approach primarily time and cost driven, or are there also aspect of increasing quality of your work / reliability of your agency process (eg generating standard UXUI vs hand designing everything) / the flexibility of what you can achieve (eg overcoming limitations of no code platforms) / being able to service new markets (eg sectors where Bubble isn’t a good fit) / anything else? Also curious to know about how this changes marketing message, both for devs and agencies. Bubble is a great brand for building a freelance career or agency, as when people find and want Bubble, they then want a Bubble developer! I think many here will have experienced this. Often full stack devs lead with their main tools, or jobs advertise for a specific tool. But with AI code, it’s a bit more general. Do you now say you run an “AI code agency”? Or are you more focused on the outcome “we help you solve your problem” and the tool is less relevant. So many questions I have! I have no particular view on these things at this point, and I’m looking forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts!