Last year, someone made a point that even if building an AI workflow in n8n takes ~9 minutes and building the same thing as a Claude agent takes ~4–5 minutes, the n8n route is still better because you get reliability, scalability, visibility, consistency, fewer risky AI actions, and the agent stays inside the boundaries you set. But that was before Claude dropped skills, connectors, and a bunch of new features that (in some cases) replace no‑code automation tools. I’m not sure if they replace them in all cases, especially for business workflows. So now I’m wondering: Does that old logic still hold up? Are people still choosing n8n for serious workflows, or are Claude’s features good enough to replace that whole setup when both approaches can solve the same problem? I want to hear everyone’s opinions. Share your thoughts and let others jump in, correct, debate, whatever. 👀

hi, i am ven. good to see u guys here. any recap of what was going on here?

Hi there, When building AI Agents or Automations does anyone have experiences where it makes mistakes? I ask because I speak with experience that when I use gemini or chatGPT, they get information wrong ALL the time, which is why AI needs human oversight, additionally I find that if I ask AI a question, I can ask the same question a few days later and get a polar opposite answer Does anyone have experience with this?