A recent excavation in Panama revealed a spectacular burial. At the centre of the tomb lay a high-status individual buried nearly 1,000 years ago. Around the body were gold ornaments, ceremonial objects and other human remains. The burial appears to belong to an elite member of a pre-Columbian society connected with the El Caño culture. This type of discovery tends to generate headlines. Gold. Treasures. Powerful rulers. But it raises a deeper question about archaeology itself. Why do we almost always discover the rich? Elite burials are often the most visible because they were designed to be. Powerful individuals were buried with wealth, symbolism and monumental structures. These burials were meant to project authority beyond death. They were political statements. But this creates a problem for archaeologists. If most surviving burials belong to elites, then the archaeological record becomes skewed. We see kings, chiefs and rulers. But we rarely see farmers, labourers or ordinary people. It is possible that our understanding of ancient societies is shaped heavily by who could afford to be remembered. In other words, archaeology may often preserve the propaganda of power. Questions for the community: Do elite tombs give us a distorted picture of ancient societies? Are we mostly studying the top 1 percent of ancient populations? And what do you think about the other human remains found in the tomb? Possible ritual sacrifice Retinue burial Family members Symbolic burial companions What do these practices tell us about power, belief and the afterlife?