Group discussed launching paid VIP membership with daily calls, announced contest winners, reviewed projects including AI animation and game development, and debated AI model complexity and language barriers. Captured meeting · August 1 · by Tu Michael (with help from AI, of course ^^ ) Key Takeaways - VIP community launching next week: $49/month with daily calls, recorded transcripts, and searchable database; all active members get free lifetime VIP access - Contest winners announced: Chris wins best Candy Crush clone and most useful app (Suno stem separator), Paul wins most creative, John wins best group member - Michael's AI animation placed top 50: Entered CapCut/Vietfilm AI Talent contest using Sora-generated clips stitched in CapCut, demonstrating professional-quality anime-style output - AI models are getting harder to prompt: Newer models use larger vocabularies with more ambiguous language, creating barriers for non-native English speakers and less experienced users Topics Discussed Speaker Diarization for 4,000 Videos Discussion about processing a large video archive to extract transcripts and tag speakers. Parallel processing on multi-core hardware could reduce the estimated 14-day serial timeline significantly. - Tools mentioned: Parakeet (IBM), Nemotron (Nvidia), Cole Medlin's $17/month service - Key challenge: Diarization (labeling who said what) is harder than transcription itself - Google Gemini advantage: Can tag speakers by login identity during live meetings, but backfilling archived video is a different problem. 1. Michael's AI Animation Work Michael demonstrated two anime-style short films created for a CapCut/Vietfilm AI Talent contest, placing 36th out of top 50 and advancing to the next round. Previously won top 3 in a smaller international contest when Sora launched. - Workflow: Generate 15-second clips in Sora with consistent characters using a "collage method" (face, full body, environment references), then stitch in CapCut

vibes is on...

Do you agree with my placement of each model? Grok is obviously the super engineer, a bit edgy but knows how to execute better than anyone, AKA Gilfoyle Claude is technically the leader, but harbors massive delusions of grandeur & narcissistic tendencies, AKA Erlich, ChatGPT is the most well rounded, leader of the pack, first mover who invented the tech, but also just flakey, unpredictable, and destined to let people down, AKA Richard Kimi is cheap and no one actually pays attention to it, but it's strong under the hood, AKA Jared - this one would have been funnier as Jian-Yang, but he's not in the photo Gemini is actually a very reliable engineer with output that is on par with Grok most of the time, but no one really takes it serious for some reason, and it just tends to get abused and treated as comedic relief, AKA Dinesh What do you think? Did I get them right? Which one would you swap out or change?

Friday night vibes starts in 24 hours

How many of you guys are on X? Drop your handles in here. I’m @vibecodeguild