Eric Daugherty on X: "🚨 LMAO! Elon Musk has reportedly bought into the company that now OWNS CNN He reportedly put about $1 BILLION into David Ellison's Skydance, which took over Warner Bros. Discovery this month So people who have ownership stakes over CNN include Elon Musk and Trump ally David https://t.co/g6AQKEwpqx" / X This is great for us filmmakers who aren't far-left like myself I'm fifty percent right wing at least, maybe more now. I support Trump and Rubio especially. Maybe I will get my idea made into a TV show one day if not in the mildly possible next life...?

Been working hard on this concept art so I'm gonna drop here for feedback. I hope you like it! I'll show you the hero's after I get final approval from everyone. **Every villain personifies a lie or a propaganda tactic, never a people, an ethnicity, or a faith.** - They're drawn through what they *do*, using masks, scripts, puppets, screens, megaphones, fake sets, and bureaucracy. - No villain gets ethnic or religious costume cues. That means no keffiyehs, hijabs, crescents, Arabic script, or religious symbols, and no ethnic or identity caricature. - When a villain targets a real movement or organization, like Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood playbook, or campus DEI grievance culture, the design hits its *tactics*, not the people it claims to represent. - The Red-Green Alliance shows up only through the dark forest green accents and the partnership between the Commissar and the Entryist, never through Islamic symbols. - Every villain is an original fictional character who resembles no real person. - The henchmen (the "Useful Idiots") are brainwashed, not evil. They can be freed and recruited, which fits the community's "we welcome disagreements" spirit. This core principle will help to avoid lawsuits (hopefully) Rouges gallery is a concept I borrowed from Batman. I also borrowed the Marvel Avengers concept for the hero's which you will see later. Each hero has a unique look and identity but they also fight together as a team. But for now you get the villains only. I expect more to be added over time. The Commissar: The Big Bad The communist propaganda chief who rewrites history in red ink and announces it through a golden megaphone. He wears a crimson greatcoat with forest-green lining and wields a giant fountain pen like a scepter. Every other villain takes his orders or steals his playbook. Rival: the whole Warriors for Liberty team. The Entryist: Infiltration A polished politician type in a forest-green three-piece suit with a gold serpent lapel pin. He holds a porcelain smiling mask and works masks on puppet strings into the capitol, campus, and newsroom. He's the Commissar's partner in the Red-Green Alliance, and he doesn't storm the gates; he gets hired. Rival: Balefire (secondary).

What happened today in the discussion group got me thinking - once the initiative was taken and the free discussion used 2's in the chat, the discussion, almost immediately, became more pleasant. To be more accurate, it became more pleasant for people like me, and less enjoyable for those with the opposite preference. The dormant scientist in me was then tempted to do what scientists do - observe the next crowded free-for-all discussion quietly, and draw a pie chart of proportion of time spoken by participant. I suspect such chart would contain three or four big slices , with all other participants represented by thin ones if at all. The thing is that such chart would provide little insight on the quality of the conversation, as some people enjoy an unregulated discussion, either for its spontaneous nature or for technical reasons, while others regret the need to use one's virtual elbows in order to be heard. Fortunately the solution is within reach - the next time some of us want a discussion with 2's , all they need to do is to move to another room so that there would be a choice between the two discussion cultures. This is technically feasible and does not require anyone's approval. Eureka.

Please bear in mind that my discussion and debate skills are terrible. I'm much better when things are written down so I can respond via the written word. I may have made my atheist arguments look bad but I can assure you they're not: 1) https://www.youtube.com/live/EybeERtAGQw?si=BoaacoWTMgF50Kvc 2) https://www.youtube.com/live/sd6ESAu7T_w?si=BBiQB27-nS9hKKLQ I will be returning to the shows soon when I'm fully prepared

Atheism is a lack of belief or a strong disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods - a philosophical or religious position characterized by disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods - Webster Dictionary based on this definition we will discuss and determine: 1. the difference between religion and atheism 2. what is moral codes 3. can atheists have a moral code as a group