Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Toby

NLP Connect

107 members • Free

Join NLP Connect! Access free trainings, tutorials, and podcasts for personal and professional growth in a lively community of NLP enthusiasts!

Memberships

Coaching Resource Room

1.2k members • Free

Leadership Skool

1.6k members • Free

24 contributions to NLP Connect
NLP Surgery - Phobia Model
I believe some people had a problem accessing todays NLP Surgery, so I ran it again and recorded the session for you. This weeks question came in from Sarah asking about NLPs Fast Phobia Model. Please also read pages 184 to 185 of Toby and Kates book - 'The NLP Practitioner', before practicing this technique and have a read of the attached PDF for more information. You can also see Toby demonstrate The Fast Phobia Model in front of a live audience many years ago. The technique is the same as is the outcome: The client successfully releases the phobia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgwgLI2Didc Please post your questions here for next weeks NLP Surgery which will go live from The Lake District where some of us are meeting up for a walk and talk (Please see separate post if you want to join us).
1 like • 2d
[attachment]
I need your advice: Public Speaking Programme
Before I roll out my newly updated public speaking course, I’d love to know if it’s something you’d be interested in. Below you’ll find the key details, dates, and pricing. Have a quick read and, if it speaks to you, either hit the thumbs-up on this post or drop a comment to let me know you’re interested. Thanks in advance for your feedback and support. SpeakUp: Public Speaking & Speaker Trainer Certification Programme A six-day immersive experience designed to take you from crafting powerful keynote presentations to delivering them on stage — and ultimately training others to do the same. Set in either London or Lockerbie, Scotland (near Carlisle), this programme blends practical speaking skills, business strategy, and real-world performance. Programme Overview Dates & Times - Public Speaking Intensive: Wednesday 7th – Friday 9th October 26 - Trainer Certification: Friday 9th – Sunday 11th October 26 - Daily schedule: 10:00 AM – 3:00 PM - Daily independent work: 2 hours (guided homework and preparation) Course 1: Public Speaking Intensive (3 Days): Designed to help you build, structure, and deliver a compelling keynote presentation with confidence and clarity. Day 1 – Wednesday 7th October The Public Speaker’s Model & System - The SpeakUp framework for impactful presentations - Structuring a keynote from idea to delivery - Audience psychology and message clarity - Crafting your core message and narrative arc Day 2 – Thursday 8th October Keynote Scripting & Writing - Storytelling techniques for engagement - Writing for spoken delivery vs written content - Emotional pacing and persuasive language - Refining your keynote script Day 3 – Friday 9th October Presentation Day - Deliver your keynote live - Structured feedback and coaching - Performance refinement and confidence building Course 2: Public Speaking Trainer Certification (3 Days): For those ready to turn speaking into a business and train others. Day 4 – Friday 9th October (Afternoon Transition)
I need your advice: Public Speaking Programme
1 like • 4d
@Tina Poyzer Thank you for the feedback - very helpful. I'm guilty of presuming people know the answers to these extras - your feedback help a lot.
0 likes • 4d
@Will Davey and once you pop, you cant stop... :)
Why Your NLP Interventions Have a Biological Ceiling
Most NLP practitioners know that state access matters. You cannot run an effective process on someone who cannot get into a workable state. You cannot anchor a resource the client cannot reach. You cannot do identity work if the nervous system is too activated to take in new information. But state is not the destination. Identity is. State is the vehicle that gets you to the work. If the identity does not shift, the state collapses back to baseline as soon as the session ends. That is why clients can feel completely transformed after a session and slide back within a week. The state changed temporarily. The identity did not move. Everything we do as practitioners is ultimately in service of that identity level shift. What most practitioners do not talk about is what sits underneath all of it at the biological level. And understanding that makes you a sharper practitioner. Lisa Feldman Barrett is a neuroscientist who wrote a book called Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain. The first lesson is titled "Your Brain Is Not for Thinking." That title alone is worth sitting with, because it directly challenges an assumption we carry into every session. Barrett's argument is straightforward. The brain's primary job is not cognition. It is not problem solving, creativity, or emotional regulation. Its primary job is to manage your body's resources so you stay alive. She calls this body budgeting. Think of it as a biological balance sheet. Sleep, nutrition, movement, and recovery make deposits. Stress, illness, poor sleep, and isolation make withdrawals. The brain runs this calculation continuously, predicting what your body will need next and allocating resources accordingly. Here is where it connects directly to what we do. Identity work requires a nervous system that has the resources to support change. When we are working at the identity level, we are asking the brain to build a new model of self. That is not a small ask. It requires the system to take in new information, challenge existing predictions, and invest in constructing something unfamiliar. A client who slept four hours, skipped meals, and walked into your session carrying three unresolved stressors is running a biological deficit before you say a word. Their brain is already biased toward threat detection and familiar patterns because those are metabolically cheaper to run than anything new. You can run a textbook identity process and hit a wall not because the technique is wrong but because the system does not have the resources to support the shift.
2 likes • 5d
A well-argued piece, especially in highlighting the role of physiology and what Barrett calls “body budgeting.” That said, I think it slightly overstates the idea of a strict “biological ceiling,” and underplays how change can move across levels in a more dynamic way. If you look at Robert Dilts’ Neurological Levels of Change, identity is certainly a powerful level, but it’s not the only driver, nor is change strictly top-down or bottom-up. The levels (environment, behaviour, capabilities, beliefs/values, identity, and purpose) interact systemically. A shift at any level can propagate through the others. For example: - Changes in environment (sleep, nutrition, stress load—what this article calls biology) can absolutely support identity shifts. - But equally, a shift in beliefs or identity can reorganize behaviour and even physiology over time (e.g. someone adopting the identity of “I’m a healthy person” often changes habits without needing perfect biological conditions first). - So rather than a “ceiling,” it may be more accurate to think in terms of constraints and feedback loops. Biology can constrain what’s easy or likely in a session—but it doesn’t strictly cap what’s possible. There’s also a subtle assumption here that identity change requires significant metabolic “investment” upfront. Dilts’ model would suggest that sometimes identity shifts can occur quite rapidly when the intervention aligns cleanly across levels—particularly when meaning changes. In those cases, the new identity itself can reorganise the system, including improving behaviours that then restore the biological “budget.” In other words, causality doesn’t only run:biology → state → identity It can also run:identity → beliefs → behaviour → biology or even emerge simultaneously across levels. One practical implication is that while supporting physiology is clearly valuable, practitioners don’t necessarily need to treat it as a prerequisite or limiting factor. Sometimes working at the level the client is most responsive to - whether that’s environment, behaviour, or meaning - can unlock change that then stabilises elsewhere.
Can't Visualize... Not True
A lot of people claim that they can't visualize, or they claim that their clients can't visualize. Unless you or your client has been diagnosed by a doctor with aphantasia, that is 100% not true. For context, research across multiple studies puts aphantasia at roughly 1 to 4 percent of the general population. To put that in perspective, out of 1,000 people, that is somewhere between 10 and 40 people. Rare, but not zero. And for the auditory side, anauralia is the inability to produce an internal voice or replay sounds in the mind. Research also shows a connection between anauralia and aphantasia, meaning they sometimes occur together. Both are genuinely rare. The overwhelming majority of people claiming they can't visualize or can't hear an internal voice simply have not been shown how to access those systems yet. There are three things you can do. 1. Accept the premise and limitation that you or the client can't visualize and give up. 2. Use the NLP synesthesia pattern to lead them from one sensory modality to open up another. That is exactly why we have the module of behavioral flexibility. 3. Pay attention to their words, catch their preferred sensory modality and their accessing cues, and then go from there. Too many times people claim they can't make pictures in their head while looking up and using words like "see," "picture," "clear," and "bright," or claim they have no inner voice while the words they choose reveal active auditory processing happening below their conscious awareness. Use the apple test to show them they can visualize, and remember it doesn't have to be crystal clear Leonardo da Vinci type visions. Even a blur is visual. Sometimes I think when people say they can't visualize it's because they can't make a perfect picture, which can be a thread to pull on to explore if they're a perfectionist. For the internal sounds or dialogue, use the countdown test, or have them remember their favorite song and have them first hum it out loud and then have them stop humming and see if they can still hold the sound in their mind, which 99% of the time they can.
Can't Visualize... Not True
0 likes • 5d
I get what you’re aiming for here—encouraging people not to limit themselves is valuable. But I think there’s a subtle linguistic and cognitive issue in how the word “visualise” is being used. “Visualise” is actually doing a lot of heavy lifting as a term. It’s what linguists would call a kind of nominalisation—it bundles a wide range of internal experiences into one word, which can mean very different things to different people. For some, it really does mean seeing a clear mental image. For others, it’s more abstract: a sense of spatial awareness, conceptual knowing, emotional tone, or even a mix of non-visual sensory impressions. So when someone says “I can’t visualise,” they may not be wrong—they may simply not experience mental imagery in the specific visual way that’s being implied. They might process internally through movement, sound, language, or felt sense instead. There’s also a growing body of research suggesting that mental imagery exists on a spectrum, not just as a binary of “aphantasia vs normal.” So while aphantasia may be statistically uncommon, that doesn’t mean everyone else has vivid, picture-like imagery—or that they access it easily or naturally. In that light, it’s probably more accurate (and more helpful) to say: people have different dominant internal modalities, and “visualising” doesn’t look the same for everyone. Rather than assuming a deficit or a lack of skill, it can be more productive to meet people where they are and work with how they already experience things internally. So the goal might not always be to “prove they can visualise,” but to broaden what counts as valid internal representation in the first place.
NLP and Caring
Hi everyone, I’ve noticed many students, clients, and friends are currently balancing everyday life with caring for elderly parents. For example, I have a friend whose mum is in a care home, and I’m encouraging her to lean into her NLP tools and our coaching community for support. Asking questions like, what belief could you choose to support you during this chapter of your life? I’d love to hear if anyone has had direct experience combining NLP thinking and coaching tools specifically to support carers or grown up children walking this path. Thanks in advance for sharing your insights! XX
NLP and Caring
1 like • 5d
@Franz Saint-Fleur “my girlfriend’s gifted children.” Tell us more…
1-10 of 24
Toby McCartney
3
15points to level up
@toby-mccartney-7867
A supportive NLP community by Toby and Kate McCartney for personal growth, connection, and learning with like-minded development enthusiasts.

Active 20h ago
Joined Oct 31, 2025
London, Scotland and Turkey