You will more scrutinized for more transactions anything over 200 $ now will be watched more! You can get red flagged if you do a lot of small transactions, AND THEY WONT TELL YOU YOUR FLAGGED!

I went MIA PURPOSELY, it was a detox from toxic habits, people, and time wasting! It helped release need, redirect my passion, to productive outlets and out comes, to understand what I’m meant to build. As a result I found out some amazing things Did you know that this type of marketing is amazing The Culture of COMMUNITY I HAVE TO GIVE IT TO THE CREATORS, They took the phycology of human needing to belong to something, being nosey, consumerism , addiction, thirst for knowledge & exclusiveness, and created a massive CULT LIKE PLATFORM OF MONETIZATION! CULT-URE like a Chruch, social media, AA, (that all existed before this platform ) and used a tool to CREATE A PHENOMENON CALLED SKOOL. As hard as many of you go in on here ,why do you think you feel you can only do it here? Do you think you could create something like this alone?

Being outside and marketing off platform works for me currently quicker than on platform. How many of you get quick results outside than online?

Let me introduce myself. I'm Dr. Peninah Wood Ph.D. I hold Doctorates in Functional medicine, Nutritional medicine, and Holistic medicine. I am a retired nurse, and I am also a Functional Diagnostic Nutritional Practitioner. Ann has requested that I post my daily classes here. I will post a recent one that was very popular. If a pill could fix it, it would’ve worked by now. THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE STORY: It wasn’t discovered. It was marketed. 1. WHEN IT HAPPENED (1960s - 2000s) 1960s - 1970s: The hypothesis is born Researchers noticed that certain drugs affected serotonin and norepinephrine. They guessed, not proved, that depression might be caused by low levels of these chemicals. It was a reverse-engineered idea: There was no biomarker, no test, no confirmed deficiency. It was a theory, and even the scientists who proposed it said it was unproven and oversimplified. 1980s: Prozac is developed Eli Lilly needed a simple, memorable story to differentiate Prozac from older antidepressants. They had: - a drug that blocked serotonin reuptake - no clear mechanism for depression - no biomarker to test - no way to prove “correction” But they had a marketing opportunity. Late 1980s - 1990s: The marketing era begins Prozac launches in 1987. This is when the phrase “chemical imbalance” explodes into public consciousness. Not through scientific papers. Through advertising. TV ads, magazine ads, brochures in doctors’ offices, and pharma reps all repeated the same line: “Depression is caused by a chemical imbalance. Our drug corrects it.” This was never scientifically validated, but it was: - simple - comforting - non-stigmatizing - easy to explain - easy to sell And it worked. 2000s: The story collapses scientifically By the early 2000s, multiple large reviews found: - no evidence of serotonin deficiency - no consistent neurotransmitter abnormality - no biomarker for depression - no test to diagnose a chemical imbalance Even leaders in psychiatry began publicly stating:

https://www.skool.com/@sofia-martinez-6614 Everyone that sees this go check this lady out She gave Fantastic insight on the summit gives I should include check pic Ive asked many for insight and suggestions , crickets cause I’m no longer wasting time GIVING and not receiving anything of value! I love the Wisdom wall idea Now let’s see how many bite that too🤣😭 Thank you Sofia Martinez FOR Being A REAL ONE!