Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More
1 contribution to All things coffee.
What makes an ideal particle size distribution?
Have you ever had a coffee at a café with really distinct fruity or floral notes, then bought the same beans and brewed them at home, only to find that something was missing? I've had this happen a few times, and it's got me thinking about how much of that difference might come down to the grinder. Obviously, water, brewing recipes, drippers, and plenty of other things play a role. But I'd like to focus on grind size and particle size distribution for now. There are so many grinders out there, from Mahlkönig, Victoria Arduino, and Eureka to hand grinders like Comandante, MAVO, TIMEMORE, and 1Zpresso. I'm curious how much their different burr designs actually affect distribution width, bimodality, and the amount of fines, and ultimately what we taste in the cup. And even with the same grinder, changing the grind setting can change the distribution itself, not just the average particle size. This got me wondering: Is a narrower distribution with fewer fines actually better for clarity? Could a wider distribution, or a certain amount of fines, sometimes contribute to sweetness, body, or complexity? Or does the ideal distribution depend entirely on the coffee's solubility, roast profile, brewing method, and what we're trying to bring out of it? I'd love to hear what you all think, especially if you've tried different grinders or noticed differences between brewing the same coffee at home and at a café. Have you found that certain grinders, or even certain grind settings, bring out particular characteristics better than others?
What makes an ideal particle size distribution?
0 likes • 1d
@Nam Lam I totally relate to running out of beans before you've even finished dialing them in! I don't think any grinder produces perfectly uniform particles, but I'm not sure that's necessarily the ideal either. Fines affect not only extraction but also how water flows through the coffee bed. So even with similar average grind sizes, different particle size distributions could produce quite different results. As for conical burrs, I think the interesting part is whether the extra fines are actually helping or hurting the cup. They might contribute something positive in certain conditions, while becoming a limitation in others. Maybe that's where the answer to your question about flexibility lies. And that connects to your point about dialing in. Maybe understanding our own grinder is just as important as understanding each coffee. Rather than starting from scratch every time, we could gradually build a picture of how our grinder behaves by observing drawdown times and comparing changes in clarity, body, and sweetness across different grind settings and coffees. Over time, we might begin to recognize its characteristics and identify the range where we can develop more body without sacrificing too much clarity. That could give us a much better starting point when dialing in a new coffee.
1-1 of 1
Taiga Yamazaki
1
4 points to level up
@taiga-yamazaki-7262
Hello!

Active 13h ago
Joined Jun 15, 2026
Powered by