Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Spiritual Scientist Community

156 members • Free

4 contributions to Spiritual Scientist Community
How to save America (spiritually)
This is an article I wrote a little while back...I'd love to know what you think! Let me know in the comments below. I’m an Aussie living in the south-west of England. But most of my work these days is with people in the USA. I regularly come into contact with people from different sides of the political spectrum and the overwhelming thing I’ve noticed is this:Each side thinks the other side is evil. Not just silly, misinformed, a bit wrong, or misguided…but actually evil. If each side thinks the other is evil, where does that leave us? Where does it all end up? Civil war? What can be done about it? Is it hopeless? Those who don’t take the red vs blue stance, believe that both sides are controlled by other forces beyond them. The banking cartels, the deep state, the illuminati etc etc. But ultimately, the effect is the same. “My opinion is right and yours is wrong”. Clearly, direct political action like protesting has a negligible effect. Voting, even when handled legally and fairly is mainly directed towards the 2 party system. But many on both sides believe that the election process has been hi-jacked anyway (by the other side, of course). I believe the solution lies closer to home. And I’m not talking about “finding peace in yourself before creating peace in the world”, although this has its place. I’m talking about seeking a new way forward with the people we disagree with. Try this on for size: Next time you’re having a conversation with someone who disagrees with you, listen to them. I mean, really listen to them. Try to actually understand their thought processes. Aim to be able to argue their case better than they can. Put aside your own opinions for the duration of the conversation. Decide to hang them up on the hook like a coat. Don’t worry, they’ll still be there when the conversation is over. In fact, your opinions will raise their head continually throughout the conversation, usually in the form of a strong desire to contradict, tell them they’re wrong, yell, scream or maybe even lash out. That’s ok.
0 likes • Oct 27
@Milton Lachman Hi Milton, I am very ignorant about politics. So I don't feel I'm a worthy conversationalist. You mention many things that I am hearing about for the first time. I appreciate what you've taught me about the Green party and CO2 -- that's the first I've heard about those things. I also could not find the article about "How the last Populist Revolution was won" -- could you post that here? (Others may want to read it, too.) I read an article by Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon near the beginning of Trump's current term, where Ben-Aharon contends that the materialism of Democrats is Ahriman. And Rev. Jonah Evans contends that all political parties are shot through with Ahriman and Lucifer, just like all of us. As a friend of mine says, "What a rodeo!"
0 likes • Nov 3
@Milton Lachman I know less about banking than about government, but I read the article. I appreciate the idea of "non-partisan" solutions. And I like the quote very much ("All religion is a lie that tells a truth"). I am very taken with Steiner's idea that we need to hold 12 different angles about a certain topic, in order to get at the truth about it. How to complexly relate to, and respond to, the mixture of Ahriman and Lucifer and Christ, in most everything, and everyone -- this is something I've been wrestling with for a long time...
Will vs Surrender
Did Steiner write on that? The interplay between the will forces (intending, aspiring, applying, pursuing) and the more receptive states. I find it still quite trendy in spiritual jargon (New Age primarily) to speak of "surrender" and the need for surrender and fair enough but what we are surrendering to? The "flow" could well be the status quo and the programmed societal narratives of control often times. The path of least resistance is not necessarily the higher path, the moral path. On that subject, another philosophical question that has always had a grip on me: free will or destiny? It could be paraphrased as old karma or new karma? We create new karma every day and yet there are fated events and consequences all derived from past karma. I'll pause here as too much to ponder 😜 Any reflections welcome!
4 likes • Oct 31
Lazarina, Thank you for your candor and stimulating questions on the group call yesterday. For one thing, I am a "feeling" type on the Jungian Myers-Briggs typology, so I could relate to what you said about Steiner's body of work and the strong "thinking" aspect of it... I've learned more about the mysteries of earth and humans from him than anyone else, by far. But I like to look at the pieces of territory that he left off his map, too. 😊 I also wanted to chime in on your questions about will and surrender. In Bastiaan Baan's interview with Mick (which Mick also mentions, above), Bastiaan says that God isn't going to come down on a rope and save us, as we sit passively ("deus ex machina"). As a human, we first have to take an initiative, and then the spirit world responds. And then we respond to their response. It is like will, then surrender, then will, then surrender. A dance back and forth. A relationship. I love that idea. It helps me a lot. All best. 🙏
a thank you...
Thank you to all of those who joined us today on the free Spiritual Development Session! I especially enjoyed the insights and experience our attendees shared. From Buddhist backgrounds to "Heartfulness" meditation and excellent questions regarding the trinity of Thinking, Feeling and Willing....and their connection with Steiner's work. This was a bit of a test run to see how it went, who showed up and how the Skool platform works. I'll run another session soon. For those who attended, please let me know in the comments below: - what you thought of the session - what worked and what didn't - how the session might be improved Best wishes Mick
a thank you...
2 likes • Oct 31
@Martine Debrouwere I loved Mick's recent interview with Bastiaan Baan, too. That podcast interview is what brought me to this online community. I have thought of aspects of that interview many times since then. And I have done some further research, too, because of it. (Bastiaan's comments on the Russian dissidents -- Navalny and Solzhenitsyn and their books and insights from prison -- led me to read some Holocaust literature. I am very interested in the idea that horrors can be happening around you, and you can cultivate a connection with Christ's peace in your own mind.) You write English very well. I am so impressed by people who know a second language. I hope you can understand my written English. Warm greetings, Sue
3 likes • Oct 31
Thank you, Mick, for hosting yesterday's session. It was good to meet you, and the other members of the group. 🙏 I'm going to insert the blushing emoji --😊!! I am writing to ask if you could post a description (or at least a list!) of the 6 basic exercises. I have heard them referred to many times, but I do not yet know what they are. Are they located in _How to Know Higher Worlds_? I have read that book twice, and I love a lot of things in it. TYIA.
Becoming more and more ourselves
I hope you don't mind me speaking personally here for a minute: As I get older, I realise more and more that all the previous identities I built up, are not actually me. I don't feel bad about them. They were necessary. They were all I had. But as time goes on I begin to notice old thought patterns, habits and ways of being falling away. I've always questioned everything, but now I'm not even sure who's doing the questioning. Someone said to me once that we continually build up a paradigm with which to understand the world. Then, step by step, life goes about dismantling this paradigm with it's small or big tragedies, it's disappointments and it's revelations...and we have to build up a whole new paradigm! Even the spiritual paradigms we have need to continually be renewed...otherwise they just become another dogma to cling to. Then there's the fact that as we grow, we find more and more parts of ourselves, that we didn't know existed...even as other parts die away. This can be wonderful and terrifying. But all is growth...and it doesn't seem to end. But maybe we can also find "rest" within this continual growth and movement. This is my big challenge and something I want to solve. This journey the self is not for the faint hearted. But if you're on that path to becoming more and more of who you are (whoever that is), welcome. Warm wishes Mick PS. would love to hear your thoughts and experiences on this. Please feel free to comment below and I'll get back to you asap (Art work: Antonín Slavíček - "In the Veltrusy Park", 1901)
Becoming more and more ourselves
2 likes • Oct 24
Thank you to Mick for writing about this aspect of our lives so eloquently. I notice that each new spiritual paradigm that I've thrown myself into -- deeply identified with -- eventually disappoints. What I thought was "light" turns out to have various "darknesses." In the case of the New Age, the darknesses (in my experience) were overwhelming. I found Christ for the first time in The Christian Community, and his presence continues to be there, in that paradigm, for me. But I also -- after putting that community on a pedestal -- have experienced a lot of disappointments, and see lots of shades of gray now. And then there's my own decades-long struggle with, and education about, the darknesses inside myself. Like Layne said, I have been through several major sheddings. "Thousands" of versions of myself.
1-4 of 4
Sue Bozzo
2
9points to level up
@sue-bozzo-9632
Christian Community enthusiast in Arizona, USA

Active 17h ago
Joined Sep 21, 2025
Powered by