Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
2 contributions to Speak to the Machine
Putting the Soul back into AI
I'm officially changing the name of this group to Interactive Microprompting in 24 hours. I recently stumbled on the inherent value of Interactive Microprompting within the ZeroDrift environment, within Psyncr and within every other mainstream AI model. It appears that it is a means to infuse the soul back into the authoring process—before it's too late. AI output has become increasingly efficient yet unmistakably soulless at the same time. I want to reposition this group to be an in-depth investigation into how we can use dynamic dialogue, human judgment, and meaningful friction to put soul back into what we create. The truth is that we all know that an AI agent has no soul. Only we can provide that and the dangers of that lack of genuine humanity are staring us right in the face—in an almost apocalyptic way. So we must act and we must act fast before we have no choice. An AI agent can process instructions, generate outputs, and execute tasks effectively taking us right out of the picture. Yet it cannot supply lived experience, moral judgment, human meaning, or genuine intention. Intrinsically those come from us and it is clear that the more artificial the output is the less likely it is to be read. The soul only enters the process through an ongoing dialogue where context is added step-by-step, assumptions are challenged, ideas are refined, and every exchange gives the work greater purpose. Remove that human friction and the agent becomes an efficient engine—producing lifeless answers that impress no one. So we need to stay within the process. We should not hand the thinking over to AI and call the result intelligence. AI can extend human thought, but only human engagement can give that thought direction, meaning, and soul. The sky is the limit. Let's breath life into our outputs to get the genuine engagement we all desire. Look forward to hearing from you.
1 like • 3d
This is what I commented upon with you earlier. I was using Psyncr - updating an instruction set and the original intent and purpose was to dig deep into the assessment and inquiry stage - looking for specific types of errors. The update removed the original intent and purpose and gave an instruction set that assumed the result of the inquiry had already been established. Two very different things. If the error is never found - there is nothing to determine. This was the subtle change I identified. My next questions was - if this has happened here - where else might it be happening? Human judgment is essential. I agree - 'it cannot supply lived experience, moral judgment, human meaning, or genuine intention'
0 likes • 2d
@Peter Hatherley - Yes sure. I am in UK.
Free Access to my new Psyncr™ Community Group
I’ve got some great news… If you’ve already got an existing LTD subscription to Psyncr™ you’ll get access to the new training community for FREE. DM me if you want me to set that up for you. For others, the $17/month subscription not only gives you full access to Psyncr™ month by month but it will give you access to the upcoming in-depth training that I’ve scheduled so you can get the very best out of the tool.
1 like • Jul 8
Peter - please add me- thanks
1-2 of 2
Stephen Wilk
1
3 points to level up
@stephen-wilk
Freelance media & branding specialist working with those deserving more coverage. The results help you scale using my media & advertising connections

Active 21h ago
Joined Jun 26, 2025
Manchester UK