Good question—especially if you’re new to prop firms and trying to separate a repeatable process from the highlight reels. There are definitely similarities to ICT concepts, but the training here is built around a simpler framework: where to trade, when to trade, a repeatable entry model, and risk/reward, rather than trying to find a setup that wins every time. The core idea is that there is no “magic” strategy; you need an edge that plays out over a meaningful sample size. You can revisit the Science of Trading lesson for that piece. On the success-rate question, the training actually acknowledges the high failure rate in retail day trading rather than pretending everyone succeeds. It cites roughly 90% of retail day traders failing, while emphasizing that having organized information doesn't eliminate the difficulty. I wouldn't claim that there's a verified universal “5% succeed” number for prop-firm traders based on the course material, though. The important distinction with prop firms is that they solve a capital/risk problem, not a skill problem. The roadmap recommends learning the strategy, practicing first, then using a prop evaluation to access more trading capital without putting a large amount of personal savings at risk. It specifically recommends starting with one account and working toward one payout, rather than immediately trying to copy trades across a bunch of accounts. The prop-firm roadmap lesson goes deeper into that model. As for verified individual results, I wouldn't manufacture or cherry-pick those for you. The training points members toward the community's payout/success posts, but those should still be evaluated critically rather than treated as a guarantee of what you will make. A sensible progression is finish the training → practice/replay and log results → demonstrate profitability in practice → attempt one prop evaluation → reach one payout → only then think about scaling.