@Winner Le Paradoxe Konou Thanks for the thoughtful read, I really appreciate you going through the architecture. In the current setup most retries are still handled at the infrastructure layer (GitHub API retry + webhook idempotency), and the guardrails enforce deterministic checks before any automated action. I haven’t run deeply into the agent self-replanning loop scenario yet during these experiments, but you’re right — once agents start re-invoking tools under slightly different contexts, simple retry control won’t be enough. That likely needs additional state tracking or loop detection at the orchestration level. Definitely something I’m interested in exploring as the system evolves.

@Winner Le Paradoxe Konou That’s a great point. Right now the system treats each webhook event independently, so the guardrails mainly prevent unsafe actions rather than repeated agent-driven ones. If the agent starts re-analyzing the same PR or issue and triggering additional actions, we’d probably need some form of state tracking or action history to avoid loops or redundant updates. Definitely an interesting direction as these systems become more autonomous.