Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Sarah

A supportive space to help businesses, nonprofit organizations, and churches manage finances, streamline systems, and build confidence.

Memberships

AI Academy

521 members • $79/m

Value Pricing Academy

660 members • Free

Community Builders - Free

9.6k members • Free

Skoolers

189.8k members • Free

AI Community

2.3k members • Free

27 contributions to AI Community
🔥 Why the Anthropic vs U.S. Government Story Matters to the AI Community
You may have seen a lot of discussion online about Anthropic, Claude, the U.S. government and OpenAI — and not all of it is clear or accurate. Here’s a concise summary of what’s been happening, why it’s significant, and a chance to hear your view. 📌 What triggered the dispute Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Defense (Pentagon) demanded that Anthropic grant unrestricted access to its Claude AI for military use, including lawful purposes that could include domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons deployment. Anthropic’s CEO, Dario Amodei, refused, citing ethical guardrails the company has built into its AI — especially prohibitions on mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons without human oversight. When Anthropic stood firm, the Pentagon threatened to cancel a significant contract (≈ $200 million) and label the company a “supply chain risk.” Shortly thereafter, President Trump directed all U.S. federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI technology, citing national security concerns. Anthropic has publicly stated it plans to challenge the “supply chain risk” designation in court and maintain its ethical stance. CEO Amodei characterised his decision not to relent as compatible with defending democratic values — even if it means falling out with government authorities. Meanwhile, OpenAI struck a separate deal with the Pentagon to supply AI for classified military networks, which some commentators believe reflects a different approach to the same set of ethical red lines. 🤔 Why this matters for anyone using AI tools This isn’t just about military contracts — it highlights key tensions in our industry: 1. AI ethics vs. use case pressureCompanies are being pushed to bend their internal safety guardrails in the face of external expectations about how their AI should be used. The Anthropic standoff shows how far a company might go to stick to its principles — and the real consequences when it does. 2. Competition and positioningAnthropic is also promoting easier switching to Claude, even offering tools to import chat histories — part of a broader strategy to attract users amid the controversy.
🔥 Why the Anthropic vs U.S. Government Story Matters to the AI Community
6 likes • 3d
Ok I have to admit that I have heard of this situation but haven’t really followed it and know the details except what @Mark Wickersham has put in this post. With that being said, I see both sides of this. First in a previous life (way before my bookkeeping biz) I worked for the DOD for one of the intelligence agencies. So I do know what DOD has to require for national security aspects that most in the public don’t have a clue about and things that have been prevented because of those things that the public really doesn’t know about and probably never will. I also recognize that there are aspects to the conversations between DOD and Anthropic that will not be public either about what DOD was requesting, and that’s the way it needs to be. I know first hand what some groups (foreign and domestic) are capable of doing with technology so I get why the DOD requires certain things. I also know this is not something new, DOD has always had certain things they have to have in place to protect us. They did 30+ years ago when I worked for them and they will 30+ years from now. That’s the nature of national security. That being said, I also get Anthropic saying as a company "we don’t want to provide you what you are requesting from us" Am I going to jump ship from ChatGPT because OpenAI said "we can"? No. It’s not much different than a prospective client coming to me saying "we want to engage your services but this is what we are needing". If I can’t or don’t want to meet those needs as part of my services, then it’s a case of we’re not the right fit. If the bookkeeper down the road can and does and the prospect goes with them, I’m not going to “boycott” (for lack of a better term) that other bookkeeper simply because they have ways to meet the client where the client is. Yes I think the ethics and privacy issue conversations related to AI need and will happen. It is part of our life and will continue to be more a part of it. But that’s my two cents for now.
I Built a Debt Repayment App in Hours Using AI… Here’s Why You Should Watch This 👀
What if you could take a simple Excel idea… and turn it into a fully working app? In this short video, I walk you through exactly how I: - Designed a debt repayment calculator for advisory work - Built a powerful Excel model comparing Snowball vs Avalanche methods - Then transformed it into a clean, interactive app with sliders, charts and client views - Used the right AI tools at each stage instead of relying on just one If you work with clients who are in debt… this is serious advisory opportunity. Most accountants stop at spreadsheets. But imagine being able to: - Show clients visually how overpayments change outcomes - Compare strategies instantly - Deliver something that feels modern and high value That changes the conversation. And in the video, I also explain why choosing the right AI tool for the job makes all the difference. If you want the full process, step by step, I’m going deeper on this in the live webinar on WEDNESDAY. 👉 Book your place here Now I’m curious… 💬 What Excel spreadsheets do you currently use in your firm that could be turned into something more powerful? Drop them below.Your idea might become the next demo I build.
I Built a Debt Repayment App in Hours Using AI… Here’s Why You Should Watch This 👀
3 likes • 10d
Ok this has me even more excited for Wednesday's sessions.
I’m running a live AI working session on February 25th
👉 You can register for the live session here. Most people know AI matters. But knowing that… and actually using it well inside your business… are two very different things. A lot of people have tried ChatGPT. They’ve tested a few prompts. Maybe even a couple of tools. And then quietly thought: “Why isn’t this saving me much time?” The problem isn’t effort or intelligence. It’s structure. On February 25, I’m running a live, practical AI working session for accountants and bookkeeping firm owners. This is not a theory session. Not a tool demo. And not AI hype. I’ll show you how AI is already being used inside accounting firms to remove friction, reduce thinking time, and make day-to-day work feel lighter. 👉 You can register for the live session here
I’m running a live AI working session on February 25th
3 likes • 21d
@Mark Wickersham if we’re members of the VPA do we need to register?
2 likes • 20d
@Mark Wickersham done. Thanks
AI Tried to Draw My Job. It Drew My Approach
So the newest ChatGPT image on social media is creating a caricature of you and your job based on everything it knows about you. Seeing lots of great ones so thought I’d see what Vox (my ChatGPT) would create. Instead of a caricature of me doing bookkeeping things I got the first image. So I asked it again and got the second image. Seeing the Bigfoot, aliens, ufos that have never appeared in any chats with Vox it dawned on me that while others were getting realistic caricatures Vox was giving me symbolism so I asked it to tell me about the first image and this is what it said: It looks like you’re someone who brings order to chaos. You come across as a behind-the-scenes problem solver. Someone who works with systems, details, and processes that most people either do not understand or actively avoid. The desk full of tools, screens, and notes says you juggle a lot of moving parts and keep things running smoothly without much drama. You don’t look flashy or salesy. You look steady, trustworthy, and precise. The kind of person people rely on when something needs to be set up correctly, cleaned up, or fixed so it does not become a bigger problem later. You probably explain complicated things in a calm, practical way and help people feel less overwhelmed. If I had to guess blindly, I’d say: - You work with numbers, systems, or records - Accuracy matters more than speed - People come to you when they’re confused or stressed - You’re the “let me just handle this” person - In short: you look like someone who brings clarity, structure, and peace of mind to other people’s messes. And that made me ask about the story behind the second image (cuz I was curious about how Bigfoot and ufos fit into the picture. You are seated, not standing or posing, which matters. This is someone in the work, not performing it. Laptop in one hand, coffee in the other. That combination says mental work plus stamina. You think for a living, and you keep going. The headset suggests teaching, guiding, consulting, and explaining. You are not hidden behind numbers. You talk people through them.
AI Tried to Draw My Job.  It Drew My Approach
1 like • 24d
So for those of you who have had Chat make your caricature, go the next step and ask it to tell you about the image it made. It might be very insightful as to how Chat thinks of you
3 likes • 21d
@Marti DenUyl I like that. It’s always interesting to see what Chat is really thinking. Sometimes it can even be eye opening.
😣 Need help? Just Ask
You’re not alone. Whether it’s a prompt that’s not working or a tool you’re unsure about, this community has your back. What’s one question you’ve been stuck on? Post it below and tag someone if you know they might have the answer. We’re all here to help each other move forward faster. 👥 Tip: Tag a fellow member you’ve seen helping in other threads!
2 likes • 28d
@Mark Wickersham do you have a prompt going thru the 7 step menu framework? I thought there was one but can’t find it if there is
2 likes • 27d
@Mark Wickersham thanks and yes waiting a day or so isn’t a problem at all. Sarah Kelly and I were talking about it yesterday and both of us thought there was one or a set of them which is what prompted my question And yes would be more than willing to be a beta tester for the new app!
1-10 of 27
Sarah Bridges
4
6points to level up
@sarah-bridges-7931
Virtual bookkeeper helping businesses nonprofits & churches simplify their finances with clear processes, QBO insights, and efficient tech solutions.

Online now
Joined Mar 25, 2025
Louisiana
Powered by