Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The Path

99 members • $949/y

Basecamp

1.1k members • Free

2 contributions to Basecamp
AristotleTidBit and Reflection
Currently going through Aristotle for a research paper, and thought I’d share a fundamental idea of his that seems relevant to the ongoing discussion. This is a piece of quoted commentary on Aristotle’s general view of what nature and/or natural objects are: “Nature is, or natural objects are, that which itself contains the determination of what it is or is to be, while art is, or artificial objects are, that which has this determination elsewhere. In the plant the determination is in the plant; in the house it is in the builder. The plant makes itself under the conditions of its making. This the house does not do.” For Aristotle, the final end of a natural object, its purpose, its destiny, in some sense dwells within it from the moment it comes into being. This end, or telos, guides the growth and development of its matter, and its environment shapes this natural progression. Its path of becoming, then, is already set from its conception, and changes depending on how other natural objects and forces act upon it. While plants and animals certainly have this kind of determination in themselves, they do not have agency or possession over it. But humans do. And this is what it is to be an human being: to have a destiny, a journey of its own becoming, and perhaps more importantly, the capacity to intentionally engage the journey. Artifacts on the other hand, i.e., tools, buildings, machines, receive their end in a preconceived way. A builder has an end in mind, and chooses and shapes matter to bring his idea into existence; and it’s fitting and good for humans to work with the world in this way to bring forth art, expressing ideas by doing so. But something else happens in machine time. In machine time, an externally preconceived end is placed on the human person in way that’s indifferent to the end already existing within them. This industrial framework not only competes against the destiny of the human person, but blinds them to it. It also shapes the environment in which the person lives, making it difficult to even recognize the existence of the frame.
1 like • 4d
I very much like the idea of the 'listening into' what the world is telling us, our body and mind and listening to our gut. Does this - or - how does this fit into a framework of searching for happiness or purpose? Is it limiting to find peace and stick with it rather than to continue to seek and be challenged and wrestle (life long) with the discomfort of the new, different and abstract? For me, the challenge and joy (maybe like Steven's Father) is to find the peace and joy in what we do and strive to do the best at it while we are there, and be open and prepared to what opportunity comes next, and, accept it when we can and leave the place we were better than we found it. Not constantly looking for the next (creating angst/anxiety) but building on ourselves to be ready. The tree grows with its destiny within it - and hopefully it will be strong when used to build and endure as part of a house, something bigger than itself. Apologies for the mind wandering.....not entirely well thought out prior to posting.
June…
What is everyone focusing on this month in their monk manual or otherwise?
3 likes • Jun '25
Stepping back - to better serve, remain curious, and let the family (and team) lead.
1-2 of 2
Robert Gray
1
1point to level up
@robert-gray-5245
I am a man trying to live with depth, courage, and intention.

Active 18m ago
Joined Jul 6, 2024
INTJ
Pasadena, CA
Powered by