Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Humans, Not Users

9 members • Free

5 contributions to Humans, Not Users
What a Picture Book Is Teaching Me About Design
I've got a confession to make. The work I most look forward to at the moment isn't strategy or accessibility. It's a children's picture book I'm working on self-publishing. It's also, unexpectedly, teaching me new lessons in inclusive design. A picture book is arguably more image than words, and an audience that will not politely pretend to be engaged. Plus, once it's out there, it's kind of hard to release a fix or an update. 😅 Respect your audience. Don't over-explain. Let the medium do its share of the work. Sound familiar? I sometimes think the things we do purely for joy end up teaching us more than the things we do to get better. So... what's yours? The thing outside work that has quietly made you better at work. I'd love to know.
1 like • 5d
Being alive. I have multiple disabilities, including vision, loss, hearing loss and mild cerebral palsy and what I do at work is pretty much the same thing I do in my day-to-day life and what I do in my day-to-day life is pretty much the same thing that I do at work and people seem to think all you need a work life balance well I can’t simply bring vision to my right eye at 5 PM. I can’t simply turn my right ear back on at 5 PM so in terms of what I do outside of work to help me be better at work? I simply live my life.
0 likes • 2d
@Maya Sellon of course 🫂 I hope I didn’t shock you too much?
When They've Already Decided
We often assume the person blocking us needs more information. So we build a better deck, find one more statistic, rehearse a sharper case. But most people who've decided something isn't a priority aren't under-informed. They're protecting something — a deadline, a budget, a promise they've already made to someone upstairs. More information doesn't move them, because information was never the obstacle. What I've found works better: before making your case, ask one question. "What would this need to not put at risk for you?" It changes the conversation from you versus them to both of you versus the problem. Sometimes the answer tells you exactly how to shape your proposal. Sometimes it tells you this isn't the moment, which is also worth knowing before you spend your credibility. Try it this week and report back. I want to hear what the immovable people in your world are protecting.
0 likes • 7d
I think your use of the term blocking confused me a bit. I do have something that sounds kind of like what you’re talking about. More than once, I’ve been asked to review an accessibility performance report, ACR, that has a lot of fields left blank, or some things are just hard to follow and then come to find out they already purchased the software without any of us, knowing about it. I think that happened twice so far.
The Work Nobody Clapped For
Tell us about a piece of work you're still proud of that nobody really noticed. Not the award-winners. The quiet ones. The flow you untangled that stopped a hundred support calls no one ever traced back to you. The wording you fought for that finally made something make sense. We often assume good work speaks for itself. It doesn't. It usually whispers, and it's often whispering to an empty room. So this is the room. Brag quietly below. I promise I'll cheer for you.
1 like • 10d
@Maya Sellon So DAISY is an acronym that stands for Digital Accessible Information System. If you have a relative who uses the National Library Service in the US or RNIB’s equivalent in the UK? Those are DAISY books. They allow for much finer navigation, sometimes down to the word level depending on if the book is audio (human recorded) or text (displayed visually or read through artificial TTS (text to speech) or AI voices. How did I convince the campus to adopt it? That’s the easy part. I’ve been pushing for DAISY (and especially its modern successor, EPUB, which if you have something like a Kobo e-reader you’d be familiar with) over PDFs for a while now. So I’ve exposed my team and others on the campus to the format. When I pitched the idea in one of our weekly meetings to make the magazine a DAISY audio book? My CMO said three simple words: “I love it.”
1 like • 8d
@Maya Sellon I’ll write you privately on that one :-)
The 30-Second Reframe
Next time you need someone to care about a fix, try swapping the compliance version for this. Instead of: "This isn't accessible." Try: "Right now, someone can't finish this because [specific real thing that breaks for them]. Here's what fixing it means for them, and for us." The formula: name the person, not the rule. Name the impact, not the standard. Try it once over the next week, in a meeting or a message. Come back and tell me what happened when you did.
0 likes • 13d
@Maya Sellon from what I can tell it’s basically disappeared electronically. You know a while back I basically put together a custom sort of in case of emergency user manual in the event of me being out for an extended absence, and I made it in word with all the proper headings and what not and I was looking at that the other day and I thought “why isn’t everything like this?”
0 likes • 10d
@Maya Sellon well you know I told people it’s basically like a PowerPoint outline and in fact I’m working on a video about accessible documentation and one thing that I’m gonna do is compare accessible documentation to CDs and MP3 discs from back in the early 2000s because if you think about it, Daisy and EPUB are just outgrowths of that just with more granularity.
The Assistive Technology Nobody Meant to Build
I started collecting a particular kind of story. Someone using a chatbot to untangle a dense policy document they’d been avoiding for weeks. Someone dictating their ideas because typing was the thing standing between them and starting. Someone asking AI to summarise a meeting they couldn’t follow in real time. None of these tools were designed as assistive technology. Nobody signed anything off. And yet, quietly, that’s what they’ve become for a lot of people. I call it accidental AT. Mainstream tools doing access work nobody planned. I find it fascinating and slightly unsettling in equal measure. Fascinating, because inclusion is arriving through the back door, no business case in sight. Unsettling, because what arrives by accident can disappear by accident too — one redesign, one pricing change, and someone’s workaround is gone. Have you seen this anywhere? A tool doing quiet access work it was never built for, whether for a user, a colleague, or you. I really am collecting these, so please tell me.
1 like • 13d
I would say the thing that’s stuck out to me in this post was your line about how something that can appear by accident can also be erased by accident and with the way things are going with AI there’s no real telling where things are going so yeah, I can definitely share your anxiety there.
0 likes • 10d
@Maya Sellon personally I would be a bit worried if we lost our aggregator. I hate the thing because it seems to go through a binary yes, no to everything but at the same time our site is pretty massive overall, small compared to Amazon, but still pretty good sized overall in terms of numbers alone and checking everything for everything would basically be impossible without an aggregator of some sort.
1-5 of 5
Rob Lambert
2
14 points to level up
@rob-lambert-5834
Currently working in web accessibility for the last 3 1/2 years and also have a lifetime of experience with multiple disabilities myself.

Active 2d ago
Joined Jul 13, 2026