Today, I read Pages 132 and 133. Here is the summary: The author said that the problem in becoming what you study is that most people forget to mind their own business and live their life minding someone else's business and consequently, make them rich. To become rich, you have to mind your own business, focus on buying assets instead of liabilities, and understand the difference between assets and liabilities. Rich focuses on the asset column, while others focus on the income column and want a pay raise, a second job, and a high-paying job. They should focus on buying income-generating assets. After that the author talked about the primary reason for remaining poor and middle class—fiscally conservative. They have no financial foundations, and that's why they can't afford taking risks. Furthermore, the author told us about that when a person loses his job, then he realizes that to which he was assuming assets —his house and car—were taking a major part of his income. These so-called assets can't help him in a financial crisis. After that, the author shared his personal experience of applying for a loan. He included all the valuables, like art collections, golf clubs, wristwatches, etc., in the asset column to show it stronger. But the loan committee paid no attention to these items. Even more, they had a problem with his rental income, and they asked why the author doesn't have a normal job with a salary. This shows that sometimes it is hard to not fit on standards. Continued... Reflection: I can relate when the author says that the middle class focuses on the income column, not on the asset. Most people emphasize a pay raise or high-paying jobs but not buying assets. I was also surprised by knowing that the loan committee was unhappy about the author's rental income and not having a job. That's a societal dogma. They are happy with a lower-paying job but not with a high-earning asset. Thanks 🙏🏻