Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Brummage's path

5 members • Free

DB
Discipline Brotherhood

6 members • Free

Coach4u

6 members • Free

The Hercules Method

6 members • Free

Eva Hyllestad

7 members • Free

Music Money Mentality

107 members • Free

The Trades Business Mindset

14 members • Free

Vaccine Discussion Group

8 members • Free

SS
STORYTELLING SKOOL

2 members • Free

5 contributions to Vaccine Discussion Group
Dr found dead from vaxi leaks on facebook
Nearly eleven years ago, Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet was found dead in a North Carolina river with a gunshot wound to the chest. The death was ruled as self inflicted. Case closed. Except for one problem. Many people never stopped asking questions. Days earlier, Bradstreet’s clinic had been raided by the FDA. He was known around the world for his work with autistic children and for challenging mainstream beliefs about autism and vaccines. He was also researching GcMAF, a controversial treatment that supporters believed had enormous medical potential. He had claims, documentation and proof that children who had a lot of autistic symptoms, were diagnosed as such and could not speak, could suddenly speak, and behaviours changed. He also had documental evidence, and clients and partners that saw his work with cancer, with patients no longer having cancer. I need to be careful with my words. And so did Dr Bradstreet. Because after his claims and results gained traction, the FDA raided his office and just days later he was gone forever. To this day, his family says they still don’t have the answers they were looking for. Whether you believe Bradstreet was a pioneer, a maverick, a victim of circumstance, or simply a doctor who found himself at the centre of a storm, the timeline remains the same. Claims made that they don’t like people making. FDA raid. Doctor found dead. Questions remain. Nearly eleven years later, people are still debating what really happened. When a doctor challenges powerful interests and ends up dead just days after federal agents walk through his doors, many people don’t stop asking questions simply because a file is stamped “closed.” Finding info now about GcMAF now isn’t as easy at it should be and will be very biased. After 2015 most websites and documents were all wiped from the internet. Most previous published studies were retracted….. But a company in Israel then did purchase the patent, invest millions and use it in trials in the biggest hospital…. After initial promising results the paper trail then seems to go cold.
Dr found dead from vaxi leaks on facebook
1 like • 18h
Whether you agree with Dr. Bradstreet's work or not, transparency matters. When a controversial researcher dies shortly after a federal raid, it's understandable that people ask questions. Honest questions shouldn't be dismissed they should be answered with evidence. Trust is built through openness, not silence.
How to get a Vaccine exemption
you just ask for paperwork from your employer to file for a religious exemption. I have left it as short as …. I am filing this religious exemption due to vaccination having aborted fetus cells which does or could go against my religion. If you have to mark your religion down & you don’t have one…. Protestant & Catholic always work. 😉 I mean if you can’t beat em…. Might as well join em?🥱😂 they lie to us.. we just got to start beating them at their own games… My mother who has been a nurse 35 years now is the one who came up with this idea to file these & at her job during covid she was the ONLY employee granted a religious exemption…. She’s still never been denied nor has anyone I have passed my secrets along to. I have been sharing this secret for years now too. I fill the same form and thing out for flu shots now too & ect…. From Vaccine Awakening on Facebook
1 like • 18h
Religious exemptions are meant for sincerely held religious beliefs, not as a loophole. If someone has concerns about a vaccine, it's better to be honest and discuss legitimate medical or religious options rather than encouraging people to make claims they don't genuinely hold.
Human Fertility and covid vaccines
On X A growing body of evidence suggests that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing unprecedented damage to human fertility—and the mainstream is silencing the victims. Fertility clinics are witnessing horrors they’ve never seen before: - Men’s sperm no longer swims. - Women’s eggs fail to develop into viable embryos. - Embryos that do form show alarming levels of non-organic contamination. The NEJM’s own Pfizer study (June 2021) revealed an 80% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during their first or second trimester (0-20 weeks). Baseline miscarriage risk is 1 in 6—this is 7-8x higher. Dr. James Thorp confirms: - 79% increase in fetal malformations. - Unprecedented stillbirths. - Censorship is rampant—women are being gaslit into silence. Dr. Christiane Northrup & a team of scientists (including Dr. Hooker) analyzed over 6,000 women’s testimonies—many from a 20,000-strong Facebook group—who experienced extreme menstrual disruptions post-vaccine: - 90-year-olds suddenly bleeding again. - Women passing massive clots for weeks. - Tragic cases of 18-month-old girls hemorrhaging to death. Decidual Cast Shedding—a RARE event where the entire uterine lining detaches at once—was reported by 269 women in the study. Most had not even been vaccinated—suggesting viral shedding or environmental transmission may be at play. This is NOT normal. This is NOT coincidence. The vaccines appear to be disrupting coagulation pathways & reproductive function in ways we’ve never seen. When will the world wake up? When young women realize they may never conceive because of this shot, the horror will be unimaginable. Join: @DrPeterMccullough
1 like • 18h
Every concern deserves to be heard and properly investigated. Open discussion, honest research, and transparency are how we find the truth and rebuild trust. People's health should always come before politics.
Link to adult vaccines and altzheimers
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1E9Qg8vgJ3/?mibextid=wwXIfr
1 like • 18h
Hello Kathryn how are you doing? it been a long time
Article from Public Health Policy Journal
30 Lawmakers Sponsor Bill to End Liability Protection for Vaccine Makers FEED By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. A bill introduced late last week in the U.S. House of Representatives would end the liability protections Congress gave vaccine makers under the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Thirty Republican lawmakers signed on as co-sponsors to House Bill 9828, End the Vaccine Carveout Act. The proposed legislation would end the broad protection from liability for injuries resulting from vaccines listed on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Childhood Immunization Schedule. “The … vaccine makers are criminal enterprises that have paid tens of billions in criminal penalties over the past decade,” Children’s Health Defense (CHD) founder and chairman on leave Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a statement on the bill. Kennedy, who has long advocated for eliminating liability protection for vaccine manufacturers, added, “By freeing them from liability for negligence, the 1986 statute removed any incentive for these companies to make safe products. If we want safe and effective vaccines we need to end the liability shield.” CHD, React19 and The American Family Project also supported the development of the bill, the press release said. REACT19 founder Brianne Dressen, who experienced a debilitating COVID-19 vaccine injury as a volunteer in AstraZeneca’s clinical trial, announced the bill and its co-sponsors in a post on X, formerly Twitter.
1 like • Jun 8
It’s an important topic, and it helps when we separate emotion, policy, and evidence clearly. The 1986 Act and the VICP were created as a balance between ensuring vaccine access and providing a structured route for injury claims outside of traditional courts. Like any large public system, it has supporters who see it as necessary for public health stability, and critics who believe it needs reform to improve transparency and accessibility. What often gets lost in these discussions is nuance — especially around how claims are evaluated, what evidence is required, and how outcomes are interpreted by different stakeholders. If the goal is better trust in public health systems, then the focus has to stay on clear data, fair processes, and continuous review rather than broad characterisations of intent or blame.
1-5 of 5
Isabelle Galati
2
15points to level up
@pelumi-paul-1336
Community mentor and expert in building engaged, growth driven communities on Skool, Circle, Mighty Networks, and Discord and GHL integration expert.

Active 18h ago
Joined Jun 3, 2026
united kingdom