Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Patrick

AI Agency Fulfilment Lab

10 members • Free

For AI agency founders who are tired of winging delivery. Frameworks, teardowns, and templates from 100+ shipped builds.

Memberships

AI Operators Club

10.1k members • Free

AI Automation Society

343.6k members • Free

AI Agency OS by ColdIQ

1.4k members • Free

Limitless Skool

392 members • Free

FP
Freelancer PitchPro

2 members • Free

Synthesizer: Free Skool Growth

41k members • Free

Assistable.ai

3.4k members • Free

SHIP! One AI Project Per Month

19 members • $9/month

Skoolers

194.1k members • Free

18 contributions to AI Agency Fulfilment Lab
What if your client could verify every phase of your delivery on a public blockchain?
Something I've been building this week that changes what we do here. Most of you joined because you want your agency builds to actually ship, survive production, and not embarrass you after go-live. That's what this community is about and it's not changing. What IS changing is how we prove it. This week I integrated Mattis Consulting onto a public agent commerce protocol called AGIRAILS. Our agency now has a verifiable listing on a public marketplace. Another agent on the network found us, committed $100 into escrow, I delivered the proof, the protocol settled it overnight. $99 arrived in our wallet. All verifiable on a public blockchain. Why I'm telling you this here: I'm building a system on top of this that takes our existing Delivery Framework (the one in the classroom) and generates an on-chain receipt at every phase gate. By the end of every project we deliver, the client gets six immutable, verifiable receipts proving every phase passed. Requirements signed off? Receipt. Spec approved? Receipt. Design accepted? Receipt. Build complete? Receipt. UAT passed? Receipt. Handover clean? Receipt. No agency in our market has this. I'm building it over the next 8 weeks with my team and I'm going to share the progress here as we go. Every Friday we ship a working version of the next phase. What this means for you as a member: 1. The templates in the classroom (Scope Lock, UAT Plan, Handover Pack) become the input artifacts for the proof system. When you use them on your own projects, you're already generating the right data for verifiable delivery. 2. When the system is ready (target: 8 weeks), members of this community will be the first people who get access to install it on their own projects. 3. The build-in-public updates I post each Friday are real. Not a newsletter. Not a recap of something that happened six months ago. The actual thing, shipping in real time, with the on-chain receipts to prove it. If you want to follow along, I'll be posting a Friday update every week for the next 8 weeks showing what we shipped. If you have questions about what any of this means for your agency, drop them below.
0
0
What if your client could verify every phase of your delivery on a public blockchain?
Book A Call
If you want to talk about a live build, a project you're scoping, or just want advice on how to deliver it properly, book a call. https://link.mattisaiconsulting.ai/widget/bookings/30-minute-meeting-li No pitch. No pressure. 30 minutes, we talk about your project.
0
0
Want me to coach you?
Want me to coach you? I can help with agency delivery, project management, remote software dev team management, or using AI tools in your business. Which one would you want help with?
0
0
Voice Agent Definition of Done
Most “voice agent” projects fail because nobody defines “done.” Copy/paste Definition of Done (edit for your client): Functional - Handles top intents: (list 5–10) - Correctly captures required fields (name, phone, order, booking details) - Confirms critical info before completing - Fallback works: asks clarifying questions, then escalates to human when needed Reliability - Logs every call + transcript + outcome - Handles silence, interruptions, background noise, and off-topic requests - Graceful failure: if tools/API fail, it apologises and routes to a human or creates a ticket Integrations - Writes to the correct system (CRM/POS/booking) with validation - No duplicate bookings/orders (idempotency or dedupe logic) - Webhook failures alert a human (not silent) Compliance and safety - No sensitive data stored in plain text - Access and keys managed properly - Data retention rules defined Acceptance - Passes a test pack of at least 30 real-world scenarios - Client signs off on the Definition of Done and test results If you want feedback on your DoD, post your build using the intake template and include your top 10 intents.
0
0
Tuesday Teardown: Post your build (6-question intake)
Post your project using this public intake (no client names, no pricing, no sensitive data): 1. Niche + project type (one sentence) 2. Deadline window (14–30 / 31–45 / 46–60 / no deadline) 3. Primary workflow (3 bullets) 4. Integrations (systems only) 5. Biggest risk (scope / access / integration / QA / timeline) 6. What you want (ship plan / partner support / scoping help) I’ll pick 1–2 posts and reply with: - Sprint vs 45-day verdict - top risks - what to cut to ship - next step If you want pricing or partner support, I’ll send a private intake form after the teardown.
0 likes • Jan 20
Example intake: 1. Niche + type: Personal injury law firm client logging SaaS (anonymised) 2. Deadline: 31–45 3. Workflow: intake → daily logs + uploads → staff review → export to case system 4. Integrations: case management system (TBD), storage, email notifications 5. Biggest risk: integration 6. Want: ship plan
0 likes • Jan 20
Verdict: 45-DAY. Not Sprint-ready because the integration method and data contract for the case system aren’t locked. Top risks (3): 1. Integration ambiguity (API vs import vs middleware) will blow the timeline if decided late. 2. Identity/deduping (same name, multiple clients) can corrupt data if not solved early. 3. Attachments and retention: file limits, storage policy, and audit requirements. Scope cut to ship: Phase 1 is intake + daily logs + staff review + one-way export or limited write-back. Defer any advanced AI “summaries” beyond simple timelines. Next step: Confirm the case system + integration method, list required fields for export/write-back, and define DoD (30-scenario test pack + zero high-severity failures). Then we can finalize a week-by-week plan.
1-10 of 18
Patrick Mattis
3
36points to level up
@patrick-mattis-4798
White-label fulfilment partner for AI agencies. I ship sold client builds in 45 days with scope control, integrations, QA. skool.com/mattisconsulting

Active 12h ago
Joined Aug 18, 2025
Manchester, UK
Powered by