I'm averaging 3 months per video. 🙄 Some might think I've got the wrong approach. Fail quickly and adjust right? BUT. Here is the good news! My first video (Steve Jobs) took about 4 months to complete. My latest one (Andrew Tate part 2) took less than 2 months to complete AND it's the best content I've made. Now we will see how my latest performs in the months ahead. But I do think I'm not too far away from learning how to create a 1 million + viral video. Maybe within my next 10 videos (hopefully). But once I hit the jackpot in the algo, the beauty lies in that people will check out my work and find a lot of other high-quality videos which increases the likelihood of a sub/fan. I'm betting that this slow path will compound into a hockey growth effect down the line. I don't know this. But I believe in it. I'm curious to hear your thoughts.

Which do you think has viral potential?

Revealing: • How to make $75,000 overnight • How to stop prepubescent kids controlling you • The optimal pricing strategy (sum-pricing) • How he stopped his Dad getting hit with glass bottles All creators need to watch this: https://twitter.com/IAmAndrewKirby/status/1673345042444853248

Excited about the virality possibilities for this one. However, I'm not happy with the text in the thumbnail. Any suggestions? I'm thinking to change to something like: - UNMASKED - EXPOSED - TRUE AGENDA - TWO-FACE? Let me know if any of these terms intrigues you more than the other. @Andrew Kirby actually suggested I do a Tate doc after my first post on Steve Jobs. It's like 6-7 months ago now. But thankfully, this man has managed to stay relevant! Any feedback & criticism is greatly appreciated 🙏

Finally, fuck! After my first documentary (which took me about 350 hours) I told myself. Make a smaller project next time! Still, I find myself more than 450 hours deep into this one. But I got it done, and it's shipped. Would be very grateful to have your guy's feedback on it: https://youtu.be/5k-vHlkFpXI