This one is fascinating and gives weight to my theory that Anthropic and OpenAI have zero chance of gaining adoption at the enterprise level over the long term https://x.com/aiatdoordash/status/2087284229751394705?s=46

I was thinking more about @J Stevenson idea of being able to surface articles in our vibe code guild brain. What if we had something like digg for voting and submitting things?

The delivery is epic, jokes are well structured and the level of GenX cynicism is perfect. Love it! https://youtu.be/0SJHeltgAhY?si=VpfKeT26SZ85cJlc

Very odd to publish all of this into the world after all their fear mongering. I don’t understand what they hope to gain here https://www.anthropic.com/research/discovering-cryptographic-weaknesses

Do you agree with my placement of each model? Grok is obviously the super engineer, a bit edgy but knows how to execute better than anyone, AKA Gilfoyle Claude is technically the leader, but harbors massive delusions of grandeur & narcissistic tendencies, AKA Erlich, ChatGPT is the most well rounded, leader of the pack, first mover who invented the tech, but also just flakey, unpredictable, and destined to let people down, AKA Richard Kimi is cheap and no one actually pays attention to it, but it's strong under the hood, AKA Jared - this one would have been funnier as Jian-Yang, but he's not in the photo Gemini is actually a very reliable engineer with output that is on par with Grok most of the time, but no one really takes it serious for some reason, and it just tends to get abused and treated as comedic relief, AKA Dinesh What do you think? Did I get them right? Which one would you swap out or change?