I've been spending time with Claude Code lately and one thing stood out pretty quickly: The real value isn't getting code written for you. It's having something that can stay inside a codebase, follow context across files, make changes, explain why it's making them, and keep moving without needing constant hand-holding. That led me to OpenClaw. What's interesting about OpenClaw isn't that it's another AI project. It's seeing how people are building systems around Claude Code instead of using it as a fancy autocomplete tool. A lot of developers are still working in a request → response loop. "Write this." "Fix that." "Explain this." The more interesting shift is giving an agent access to a real environment and letting it work through a problem the same way a developer would. Some days it saves a lot of time. Other days it reminds you very quickly why human oversight still matters. Either way, it feels like we're moving beyond AI as a coding assistant and closer to AI as a teammate that can actually interact with the project. Curious what everyone else is seeing. Are you using Claude Code for small tasks, or are you letting it operate across entire projects?