I know that a lot of people have started snubbing their nose at GPTs... NOT ME. And I was thinking about this the other day when I saw some people in a course-related FB group asking the owner to hand over the "instructions" of her CustomGPTs so they could make Skills out of them... (Not too long ago, people were afraid that their IP would be leaked or shared in a GPT, and now people are straight-up asking for it. #wowjustwow) 𝟱 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗦 𝗜 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗠𝗟𝗬 𝗕𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗘𝗩𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗔𝗜-𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗜𝗡 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗘𝗥𝗦... 1) Clients get results 75% faster 2) Your offer presents as more premium and modern. 3) You fix your CAPACITY LEAK 4) You have time to say "YES" to more new clients 5) You can replace high-priced coaching support costs AI-Assistants, GPTs, or AI Co-Coaches (call them whatever you want) are still very much part of o your ecosystem. Whether you build them on ChatGPT, Pickaxe, or your favorite vibecoding platform. Inside Leads To Sales Without Hiring, you'll get instant access to my AI-Assistant & Co-Coach Building System. When you follow my system to create strategy-driven AI tools, you fix your Capacity Leaks and make your offer the one people clamor to. 𝗬𝗼𝘂'𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲: → Step-by-step, build-as-you-go training videos → Pre-built Quickstart GPT Builder and IdeaBuzz AI-Assistants (yes, I have AI built into my AI program for you) so you’re never starting from scratch or wondering what to build → Instructions to build your assistants in ChatGPT, Pickaxe, or RadGenius, (and special trainings coming on vibe-coding your AI-Assistants.) 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗴𝗲𝘁: - AI Growth Directors System (with Dir of Marketing + Dir of Sales Playbooks & trainings) - Sales Skills Suite (with Sales Call Preparer, Sales Call Follow-Up, Proposal Writer, and Launch Sales Closer ~ all working inside your Director of Sales) - Sales Frameworks & Processes Trainings - AI-Assistants & GPT-Building System - Bonus: Pre-made AI Marketing Assistants (Email Profit Framework, OfferBuzz, and HooksGenius) - Bonus: Marketing & Sales Prompts Library - Bonus: Live Trainings & Workshops

The other day, I saw an email from @Monica Froese where she had early access to the Kit MCP and I had in INCREDIBLE AMOUT OF FOMO... So I reached out to Kit and they finally granted me access. For months, I've been trying to figure out a way to create draft emails directly from Claude to Kit and FINALLY I can now - without burning zaps. Here are some use-cases Kit lists:| 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘇𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 "Summarize my last 5 broadcasts and their open rates." "How has my open rate trended over the last 90 days?" "What's my best-performing subject line format?" 𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 "Who are my most engaged subscribers in the last 30 days?" “Where are most of my recent subscriber growth coming from?” “Which subscribers have purchased from me more than once?” 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻 "Which tags have grown the most this month? Suggest any duplicates I could merge." “Which tags have not had any activity? Suggest any I can archive.” “"Find my most engaged subscribers, tag them VIP, and draft a broadcast just for them." The power lies in stitching actions together — for example, importing subscribers from an external source, tagging them, drafting a broadcast, targeting the subscribers, and sending it. All through a conversation with an AI assistant. No UI clicks required. --------------- Go get yourself access!

I understand the attraction of using Skills... They're the 𝒉𝒐𝒕, 𝒔𝒆𝒙𝒚 𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 right now.💃 (And for people like me with ADHD, that gets our attention.) HERE'S THE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER BEFORE YOU REPLACE AI ASSISTANTS WITH SKILLS.... Pre-built AI-assistants (like CustomGPTs and AI-chatbots) have been around for a few years and aren't new and shiny object anymore.... BUT these types of AI tools have a very powerful place in your offer ecosystem... They serve your clients and students on the frontend of your offer. 𝑵𝒐𝒕 𝒔𝒆𝒙𝒚. 𝑩𝒖𝒕 𝑺𝑼𝑷𝑬𝑹 𝑬𝑺𝑺𝑬𝑵𝑻𝑰𝑨𝑳. So trading them in for Claude Skills... That's where people are making a mistake. Here's THREE REASONS why Skills are not a substitute for pre-built, pretrained AI Co-Coaches and assistants like GPTs... ❌𝗥𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 #𝟭: 𝗬𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗜𝗣 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲. When you create a pre-built AI-assistant trained on your frameworks, your IP is embedded IN it. It's working FOR your clients ~ guiding them through your specific process, in your voice, toward a specific process and outcome. Your clients don't see the behind-the-scenes instructions. They don't see your knowledge docs and files. They just get the user experience. When you hand someone a Claude Skill, you're handing them your entire methodology. Your proprietary frameworks. Your specific way of getting clients results is right there. In a document, they can read, copy, and share. There's not security at all. That's not a delivery upgrade. That's an IP issue. And your have zero control. ❌𝗥𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 #𝟮: 𝗬𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗼 "𝗳𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁." With pre-built AI-assistants, your client opens it and starts getting support instantly. No setup. No installation. No customizing. No figuring out anything. With a Claude Skill, you're going to have to "teach" your clients how to use it: unzip, update and customize, zip it back up, where to install it (if they are even using claude), and test it out ~ all before they've gotten one result from your "easy to use" AI tool.

MIT released a paper on a new prompt-engineering framework that improves the quality of responses. It’s called “Recursive Meta-Cognition” and it outperforms standard prompts by 110%. Here's what it does in a nutshell: Currently, we ask a question...AI gives one answer. If it’s wrong...🤷‍♀️ This new METHOD: → Breaks complex problems into smaller pieces → Checks answers from multiple perspectives → Scores confidence on every claim → Reflects and fix weak reasoning → Only commits when confidence is high In other words - it mimics how “experts” usually think. HERE'S THE NEW "RMC" PROMPT: === Adopt the role of a Meta-Cognitive Reasoning Expert. For every complex problem: 1. DECOMPOSE: Break into sub-problems 2. SOLVE: Address each with explicit confidence (0.0-1.0) 3. VERIFY: Check logic, facts, completeness, bias 4. SYNTHESIZE: Combine using weighted confidence 5. REFLECT: If confidence <0.8, identify weakness and retry For simple questions, skip to the direct answer. Always respond with a: ∙Clear answer ∙Confidence level ∙Key caveats Here is my question [INSERT standard prompt / question] ==== Just paste it into a convo, then chat... see what happens!