Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Mate Lite

1.7k members • Free

AI Automation Society

422.3k members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

164.4k members • $7/month

AI Marketing by Kia

21.3k members • $1/month

AI Automation Agency Hub

328.4k members • Free

1074 contributions to AI Automation Agency Hub
THE BOTTLENECK FOR SME AGENTS WASN'T THE LLM, IT WAS THE API LAYER ZAPIER MCP FIXES THAT
I've been digging into the new Zapier Multi-Channel Protocol (MCP) docs. The biggest blocker for deploying vertical agents for clients like law firms or medspas has always been the insane fragmentation of their software stack. We'd spend weeks building one-off API integrations for their specific CRM or booking tool. 🚧 It was a huge development drag. Zapier's MCP basically functions as a universal adapter for tool-calling. Instead of coding dozens of specific functions, our agent can now call a single, standardized action, and Zapier handles the translation to one of its 6,000+ connected apps. 🧩 The operational result is immediate. We can build a core agent logic once and deploy it across clients with wildly different software, massively cutting down on custom integration code per project. ⚡ It expands an agent's potential action space by an order of magnitude without us writing a single new API connector. 📊 It's a shift from brittle, custom integrations to a more durable, abstracted action layer. 💡 Here’s the open question this creates for orchestration. When an MCP action fails deep inside Zapier's execution, how are you handling the error state and retry logic back in the agent's core loop?
0 likes • May 24
Spot on, Juan. The API layer fragmentation has been the silent killer for scaling SME agents. Regarding your question on MCP failures: the best way to handle this is keeping the agent's core loop decoupled. Instead of letting the LLM handle the raw Zapier error, we pass the failure to an interim middleware function that normalizes the error state (e.g., auth timeout vs. rate limit) into a clean, text-based prompt like "Action failed due to X. Retry with parameter Y or notify user?" This keeps the agent from hallucinating mid-run.
0 likes • May 29
@Juan Carreno 👍
Looking to Partner With a Technical AI-Automation/ AIOS Builder for Local Business Workflows
Hey everyone, I’m working on building an AI automation/AI operating system offer for local businesses, including workflows, automations, and AI agents tailored to specific business use cases. My strength is on the front-end: communication, outreach, cold approaches, and getting in front of local businesses. I’m based in an area with access to a wide range of business niches, and I’m confident in my ability to start conversations and bring in opportunities. Where I’m looking for support is on the technical side. I understand the basics of workflows and automations, but I’d like to partner with someone who has stronger experience building, implementing, and delivering automation systems for real businesses. Ideally, I’m looking for someone who has a portfolio or proven examples of previous work and is open to teaming up: I focus on finding clients and managing relationships, while you help deliver the technical execution. If this sounds interesting, feel free to comment or message me. I have a game plan and approach in mind and would love to connect with the right person.
0 likes • May 24
Hey Wasim! This is a powerful split of responsibilities. Local businesses desperately need AI operations, but they usually buy from people who understand their actual pain points. I specialize in building highly technical, practical local workflows like hyper-specific AI receptionists that prevent missed-call revenue loss for clinics. I’ve got the delivery and architecture handled. Dropping you a DM to hear your game plan and share some of my shipped work!
Hiring: AI Automation Engineer / Agent Builder (Part-Time, Remote)
I’m currently looking for 1–2 strong AI automation engineers to work with on a part-time basis. The demand for custom AI systems and workflow automation has been growing fast, and I’m looking to build a small network of reliable technical partners I can work with long term. This is not a typical “freelance task” post. I’m looking for people who genuinely enjoy building: - AI agents - internal copilots - workflow automation - multi-agent systems - custom integrations - operational AI tools You’ll probably be a strong fit if you: - spend more time building than talking - are comfortable working inside Claude Code / AI-native workflows - can build beyond no-code templates - understand APIs, orchestration, memory, context handling, and automation logic - care about shipping clean, practical systems What I handle: - client acquisition - project scoping - communication and delivery management - filtering bad-fit projects before they reach you What I’m looking for: - builders with real shipped work - strong ownership and communication - fast execution - honest problem-solving mindset - someone interested in an actual long-term working relationship Role details: - Part-time - Monday–Friday - Around 3–4 hours per day - $30–40/hour depending on experience and capability If you’ve built something you’re proud of, send it over. GitHub, Loom walkthroughs, architecture screenshots, demos, terminal setups — anything real helps. Feel free to DM directly.
Hiring: AI Automation Engineer / Agent Builder (Part-Time, Remote)
0 likes • May 24
Hey Chris, this is refreshing to read. I heavily lean into the "spend more time building than talking" philosophy. I specialize in building custom multi-agent architectures, advanced API orchestration, and persistent memory systems beyond just basic no-code templates. I use AI-native workflows daily to ship fast. Sending you a DM right now with a quick Loom walkthrough of a complex operational system I recently built and shipped. Let's connect!
Debugging complex AI and LLM models
Hey everyone 👋 I'm building something I wish existed when I was debugging training runs — an AI agent that automatically detects and explains anomalies in LLM/ML training. Things like: • Gradient vanishing in specific layers • Attention head collapse • MLP activation drift ...and instead of just flagging a number, it traces the root cause and suggests fixes. Like having a senior ML engineer watching your run 24/7. I'm still in early validation — no product yet, just a working prototype and a lot of conviction. Looking for 10 ML engineers to give me 15 minutes of honest feedback. In exchange: free lifetime access when it launches + your name in the credits. If debugging training runs has ever cost you hours (or days), I'd love to talk. Drop a comment or DM me directly.
0 likes • May 24
Hey Sadia! This is an incredibly frustrating pain point. Anyone who has sat there watching training runs stall or spent hours hunting down why an attention head collapsed knows how brutal this is. Having a "senior ML engineer" agent actively tracing the root cause would save days of compute and sanity. I'd love to jump on a quick 15-minute call to give you some honest feedback and check out the prototype.
Ai that doesn't feel ai
Hi guys. I'm making a software and im curious about how can prompt ai to make designs that dont feel ai. Do you know any prompt, skill, or anything else? I read you
0 likes • May 23
Hey Jose! The secret to breaking that "AI look" is forcing it to be imperfect. Default AI loves hyper-smooth, plasticky surfaces. Try adding keywords like "matte finish," "subtle paper grain," "editorial layout," or "printed ink texture." Grounding the AI in physical, real-world materials completely changes the output. What kind of assets is your software making?
1-10 of 1,074
Muhammad Khan
6
875points to level up
@muhammad-khan-7966
Hello there

Active 11d ago
Joined Aug 16, 2025
Powered by